I coonsider the 45 day rule to be abhorrent in that it puts a plan sponsor that is lower on the compliance ladder in a better position than a pro-active, but not perfect, plan sponsor. So, let's see how we can adjust the focus of the proverbial microscope... Is it reasonable to analyze what is really going on and come to the conclusion that the payroll system was not coded correctly in December in that it excluded bonuses? I think most would agree with that statement. In the interim, was the payroll system re-programmed? Probably not. So, even though the deferral amounts happened to be correct, had there been a bonus paid it would have resulted in an incorrect deferral. Can it be argued that correct deferrals have not begun until the payroll system is re-programmed to include bonuses? If so, your 45-day period hasn't begun, yet. Just a thought.