Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/26/2017 in all forums

  1. I would suggest re-reading the document. I can't remember the last time I saw a document that didn't address this some place. As noted it might be on the compensation definition or it might be in the definition of an "active" participant or in the allocation section. Failing that I agree this one be one of those areas the PA can use their discretion.
    1 point
  2. I don't know who this mkaufman person is, but he/she has some serious juice with the IRS!
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use