I knew about the "over 25% limit allowance", since I have had experience with that particular problem; which was prompting my position. Specifically, we had one client that HAD a practice of depositing during the year more than the 25% limit. Luckily, that client would listen (eventually) to guidance provided, so we were able to get that practice to stop. Thinking back I do recall that there are aspects of our argument that support Mr. Preston's position, which was how we got that client to stop the "excess advance funding". Since that time I had an argument with an accountant who insisted that you could carry forward the deduction regardless of the 25% limit, who at that time convinced me that you could. I will need to review notes from those conversations. Unfortunately, I do not have the necessary time, and am unsure exactly were those notes are; otherwise I would refer to them now. Until that time I concede the argument, since I have no cite to support my position. Conversely, Mr. Zeller has provided a cite, which clearly indicate that I am wrong in my position. Unless I provide a contrary cite I suggest that matter is fully resolved, and I accept that I am in error. (If I can I will be sure to provide a supporting cite. Unfortunately, in hind site, after review of what I do have, I am pretty sure it does not exist.) Hopefully Mr. Preston will be satisfied with this mea culpa.