Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/12/2020 in Posts

  1. It’s not obvious that the CPA described in ratherbereading’s example violated a professional-conduct rule. Not knowing the scope of the CPA’s engagement, it’s possible—even if the employer paid wages for no work—that the CPA correctly performed her engagement.
    1 point
  2. Things have taken a dark turn. Let's turn back a bit. The IRS is unlikely to challenge compensation to an owner's wife of less than $30,000 as unreasonable even if the only work is "pillow talk advisory" in nature. But I agree, it sounds like an excess that must be corrected. Unless the last payroll was an error and it should be re-run in which case maybe it isn't an excess at all!
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use