- 1 reply
- 995 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 2,304 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,696 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,361 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,914 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,763 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,342 views
- Add Reply
- 6 replies
- 2,909 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,538 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,163 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,257 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,028 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,760 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,104 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,128 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,865 views
- Add Reply
- 9 replies
- 1,500 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,104 views
- Add Reply
- 11 replies
- 1,924 views
- Add Reply
- 7 replies
- 2,207 views
- Add Reply
Missed enrollment by a quarter in error
Have a group of participants in a 401k that were brought into the plan 4/1 instead of 1/1. None of them contributed when enrolled at 4/1. What is my correction for the missed quarter. A qnec based on the quarters ADP for NHCEs? It's a calendar year plan. I believe that since I'm within the plan year and none elected to contribute there may not be a qnec. Any help appreciated.
Spousal Consent and Notary is a fraud
Participant received a plan loan and provided the Plan Sponsor with the required documents including spousal consent which was notarized. Now appears that the consent and notarized was a fraud. Participant's spouse is now asking questions.
What should be done to protect the Plan Sponsor and what should they do regarding the made up paperwork?
Many thanks.
Rollover from traditional IRA to 401(k) plan
A participant wants to rollover her traditional IRA to her employer's 401(k) plan.
The participant has made both deductible and nodneductible contributions to the traditional IRA.
The participant wishes to rollover ONLY the portion of the traditional IRA attributable to her deductible contributions, leaving the amount attributable to her nondeductible contributions (and their basis) behind in the traditional IRA.
Can she do this? Or does any amount distributed from the IRA, even if it is a rollover to a 401(k) plan, have to prorate the distribution between the deductible and nondeductible contributions? What if the 401(k) plan didn't accept rollover contributions of after-tax amounts?
Plan Termination with Deceased Participant (No Bene)
Currently working on a Plan Termination and discovered one of the participants is deceased. This participant terminated in 1993 and since then the plan changed recordkeepers. The participant had no activity on our recordkeeping system. The Plan Sponsor does not have record of this participant’s beneficiary, since it was so long ago.
Mail sent to the last address of record never was returned to sender, so there was no way of knowing he was deceased until we checked the SSDI.
We cannot open an IRA for this deceased participant, since there is no beneficiary information. We would like to close out this plan, but cannot. Any suggestions? Are we able to move the unclaimed property to the state?
Thanks.
VCP Fee for EGTRRA Non-amender and no prior docs
Plan sponsor did not amend for EGTRRA and GUST and does not know if he initially adopted a TRA '86 document. My idea was to submit all three documents under VCP as a non-amender. My question is regarding the fee schedule for submission. There are between 51 and 100 participants in the plan. Is the fee $2,500 for all three documents or $2,500 for each document submitted under the program?
Thanks.
Changing TPAs
Does anyone know what steps are involved for a retirement plan to change TPAs?
945 PTIN
I may be getting caught up on a technicality, but I am a sole-proprietor TPA firm. My fees are not like most TPA's. I do not charge to prepare the Form 945 (or 1099's for that matter). But I do prepare the Form 945 and 1099's for a few of my clients. The technicality that I am getting caught up on is "paid preparer". Since I am not technically paid to prepare it, do I still need to file for a PTIN?
Thoughts?
Thanks so much!
FMLA
Requested verbally family leave to care for ill parent out-of-state. Request denied by immediate supervisor.
Yes, I've met all prerequisites having worked for the firm full-time for over 8 years. Confused!
What recourse do I have?
Rehired EE matter gets complicated by prior document language
There's more to the rehired employee question that came up last week. I didn't have all the information then. An employee is rehired after an 11 year separation in September 2008. He was a participant when he left in 1997, but 0% vested. The current plan document (effective date of 10/1/08) says rehired employees who were participants when they left shall enter the plan immediately on the rehire date. The prior document that was in effect when the employee was rehired says that anyone gone 5 years or more shall have to meet the eligibility requirements (1 year of service) again. The current document took over just 3 weeks after the rehire date.
Naturally, the employer's position is that the document that was in effect on the rehire date should prevail. It turns out that the extra year's contribution is several thousand dollars, so I would like to get some thoughts from my peers. Thanks for your help.
8955 SSA What is column for check box after last name?
8955 SSA What is column for check box after last name?
Can anyone tell me anything?
HRA vs FSA
Is there any benefit to an ER setting up an FSA as opposed to an HRA for employer funding only? Employees will not be contributing at all. My feeling is that if its ER funds only, the plan should be set up as an HRA, but I don't know if this is correct. Any thoughts are appreciated.
Controlled Group - setting up second plan
Plan is just over 100 participants and is audited.
30-40 EEs will be moving to a new company - but it is part of a controlled group - same identical ownership.
Happening around 10/15.
1. Option 1 would be just to do a participating ER for the Prototype Doc and include all.
2. Option 2 would be to have new plan for the new company that would be identical. Both plans would be under 100 EE's thus avoiding the audit for 2012. Would have to combine testing for coverage. ADP test, top heavy etc.
When transferring the 30 EE's to the new plan - would you have to 100% vest or could you just transfer all of their balance over to the idential plan?
Anything else I need to worry about?
Thanks
Pat
Offering Lump Sum on Plan Termination
A defined benefit plan sponsor will soon terminate the plan in a standard termination. Currently, the plan does not offer lump sum, other than small benefit cash-out lump sums. The sponsor would like to amend the plan at termination to allow vested terminated participants a limited time "window" opportunity to elect a lump sum distribution. So far, so good.
The issue is whether, in offering the lump sum election, must the vested terms also be allowed to elect a QJSA?
Treas. Reg. section 1.417(e)-1(b)(1) sure seems to require this result -- "A distribution cannot be made at any time in a form other than a QJSA unless such QJSA has been waived by the participant and such waiver has been consented to by the spouse" and "[T]he plan must also offer a QJSA . . . ."
It's certainly the case for an ongoing plan that is amended to offer a permanent or, in my view, a limited time window, lump sum election option.
Thanks.
Investment Providers
I need a provider that will open an account for one participant and allow for an advisor. I'm hoping it will be under a custodial account arrangement...
estate as beneficiary
small account ($3,500). the participant has no beneficiary or it appears next of kin. the plan says the account needs to be paid to the estate. does anyone know what the procedure is or have any experience with these payouts where there is no estate or next of kin to assist.
COBRA PREMIUM ERROR
Member had COBRA with former employer, since 6/1/2010.
Effective 1/1/2011, from open enrollment period/rate chanes , Member dropped the dental plan and had a rate increase to medical plan.
However when Member went to pay via the on-line COBRA payment for 1/1/2011--the old premium was still on-line and not the updated rates.
This continued for 2/1,3/1,4/1,5/1,6/1--all COBRA premium letters still stated premium error from carrier.
On 5/27, a staff member from the insurance broker for this group contact member to advised the premium was being billed in error via phone.
8/1 and 9/1 premiums payments was parsed out to cover the back premium due(1/1/11-7/31/11) coverage was terminated effect 7/31/2011 & Member was sent a $92.75 refund check.
My coverage should still be in effect--the premium should never have been parsed for back amounts--YOU never advised me in writing of the error and under Federal law, you can only go back and fix the error from the quarter when the error was discovered hence 6/1/2011 at best.
The Member still was under the impression given the 81 and 9/1 payments were accepted that coverage was still in effect--they did not know coverage was terminated until the refund check was sent 9/21/11 and the Certificate of Prior Coverage was sent 9/22.
Should the Member have coverage re-instated and just be back billed only to 6/1/2011?
Should premium have been applied as far back as 1/1/11 with the 8/1 and 9/1 checks from Member without advising the Member?
What are the legal issues here?
Thanks
safe harbor, new plan, eligible but not yet entered?
filling out paperwork for new plan as we speak. getting tons of conflicting info between broker dealer, provider etc.
plan: 401k safe harbor. one owner, one employee. have reqs. age 21, 1 yr, 1000 hours on plan.
the employee will reach his one year of service in early oct 2011. plan entry dates are jan/july 1. so next possible entry date for him is jan 1 2012.
plan starting now, all docs signed and dated today, will send notice to the employee, so we are within the 90 days.
must he get safe harbor contrib for 2011? some say yes since he's eligible, some say no since he's not yet entered into plan and the entry date matters also.
have googled it extensively but find no reference to entry dates....
267 attribution
Managament Co. provides management services to several restaurants. Trying to determine which companies should be part of a management group.
Management Co. Owned 100% by Person 1
Co. A Owned 85% by Person 1; 15% by Person 2
Co. B Owned 35% by Person 1; 35% by Person 2; 30% by Person 3
Co. C Owned 100% by Person 1's sibling
Co. D Owned 50% by Person 4 and 50% by Person 5
Co. E Owned 25% by Person 1 and 75% by Person 1's sibling (Different sibling from the Co. C owner)
Assume Management Co. derives 20% of its revenue from each co. If that assumption is correct then I think the Management Co., Co. A, Co. C and Co. E would be part of the group. I can include Co. A, Co. C and Co. E because siblings are family under §267.
I do not see that I could include Co. B or Co. D. Person 1 would need 50% onwership to bring Co. B into the group & Co. D's owners are unrelated.
Am I analyzing this correctly?
Thanks in advance for any guidance.
transmitting deferrals late
recently one of our clients was audited by the DOL and accused of getting its deferrals in to the plan in 12 calendar days. the labor department deemed 7 business days as reasonable. the client is a small employer. i am aware of the recent DOL safe harbor of 7 business days but this was released in 2010. as anyone been successful arguing for a few extra days for periods prior to the safe harbor being released?
Filing 8955 SSA on FIRE system
I just talked to Relius support and they said the IRS has the testing part of the FIRE system turned off until November. so they are planning on releasing the version we want in January 2012. It will be the 2012 form 8955 SSA.






