- 3 replies
- 995 views
- Add Reply
- 10 replies
- 3,570 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,082 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,342 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,131 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 949 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,616 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 963 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,443 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,436 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,390 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 2,134 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,039 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 818 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 980 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 2,435 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,134 views
- Add Reply
- 6 replies
- 1,153 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,847 views
- Add Reply
- 6 replies
- 1,630 views
- Add Reply
Restating to Pre-approved plan
A plan's documents are currently individually designed. The last digit of the EIN is 0 or 5. The EGTRRA restatement cycle is E, with a deadline of January 31, 2011.
May the plan be restated at this time using a prototype or volume submitter? I'm wondering if since the prototype era came to an end on April 30, 2010 if it is too late.
1099 income
if a shareholder in the corp receives some income in the form of a w-2 and other income on a 1099 what plan definition do i need for his 1099 compensation to be counted?
Simplify to just 70 1/2 for all employees
A plan has provision that the required beginning date is age 70 1/2, or if a non-owner for past five years, when actually terminate employment if later.
May this be amended to simply be age 70 1/2 for all employees, without being a cutback of a protected benefit, right or feature?
Profit Sharing and SEP
An employee receives the maximum contribution of $49,000 in his employer's Profit Sharing plan. He has a 33% ownership in his employer's company. Can he also contribute the maximum amount to his SEP during the same plan year?
I saw some discussion on this topic back about 4 or 5 years ago and it was permissible then. Have the rules changed since then?
Elective Deferrals
My client has a participant who was recently in an accident and is in an unconscious state in intensive care. He does not have a POA for his wife, nor can he sign a form or call the Recordkeeper to elect his deferrals to be suspended.
The participant is currently receiving disability and the client would like to suspend his payroll deferral. Can the plan suspend the his payroll deferrals under these circumstances without his consent? Thanks.
Administrative Fees
If the Recordkeeper will be increasing a plans administrative fees next year and these fees are paid by the plan participants and allocated gross per capita. Is there any legal requirement to notify the participants of this change in fees?
Suspension of Benefits for Non-Union employment
Can a multiemployer DB plan stop payments to people who retired from Union employment (at then-age 55 NRD) that are now collecting a monthly check and working in non-union employment?
I thought not, don't see any such language in the current plan document, but others are insisting yes, the plan should contain this language or could be amended to contain this language.
Web Based Communications
Opt in for non-web usage - my client is interested in requiring all communication/activity for participants to be web based - for example participant would have to opt in to get paper statements - is there any DOL guidance on this?
RMD in year of death
Participant who has been receiving required minimum distributions dies before his 2010 birthday. For his 2010 RMD, do I use his actual age as of his date of death (79) or the age he would have attained in 2010 (80) had he lived?
Thanks!
DFVC fees
Plan sponsor files a small plan 2007 5500 via DFVC in June 2010; paid their $750 fee. Turns out the 2008 filing has not been made & the 2009 filing will more than likely be late. Both will be large plan filings. Can they apply the $750 paid in June to reduce the $4,000 DFVC fee for 2008 & 2009?
Thanks in advance for any guidance.
contributions question
An employee with spouse coverage is contributing the maximum monthy amount to his HSA from January to September. October 1, spouse gets her own coverage at a new employer and it is non-HDHP coverage. Can the employee continue to contribute the amount for employee only coverage for the balance of the calendar year? It will put him over the employee only limit. Thank you.
True-ups for only participants hitting 402(g)
I've got a client on a prototype plan that allows for (but doesn't require) a true-up to be made for its matching contributions. It's not a safe harbor. For the past few years, they've only made true-up contributions on behalf of employees who have hit the 402(g) limit. Their theory is that this is fair because these employees are shut off from making additional deferrals to get more matching contributions.
I'm concerned that this might be discriminatory because it's more likely to benefit HCEs, although I don't yet have the numbers to back this up. My first idea was to have them make true-up contributions to all employees for the years affected, but we found out that this is going to cost a boatload of money. My other concern, of course, is that the plan doesn't say that you can make any type of contribution on behalf of people who hit the 402(g) limit, but not others.
I suppose we could try to plug this scenario into the plan retroactively and try to clear it through VCP, but I'm not sure how much luck we're going to have, unless we can show that this is definitely not discriminatory. For what it’s worth, they just got done with an IRS audit and this issue didn't come up.
Anyone have any thoughts or ideas as to where to go from here? I also doubt they're going to want to refund the true-ups for the people who got them, but that might have to be the answer. If you've got any thoughts, let me know. Thanks in advance.
JB
Company A has a 401k, Co. B has a SIMPLE
Company A acquires company B in October of 2010. Company A has a 401k plan, company B a SIMPLE IRA plan. Company A permits company B to continue with the SIMPLE plan until 12/31/10 at which time it will be terminated. All employees will be eligible for company A's plan in 2011.
Questions
1) Can company A make the required SIMPLE matching contribution on the 2010 obligation in 2011 or do they have to make it in 2010?
2) Are the company B employees prohibited from rolling over their SIMPLE plan assets into the new 401k if they have not been in the SIMPLE plan for more than 2 years?
Roth 401k
Given the recent changes enacted regarding the Roth 401(k) plan, can anyone cofirm whether required minimum distributions are still imposed on Roth 401(k) accounts? Also, can a participant of a Roth 401(k) plan rollover into the plan a profit sharing account from a previous employer's plan? Only employee deferral sources are allowed to rolled over into a Roth 401(k) plan?
Multiemployer signatures
Under EFAST2, are there any complications for multiemployer plans where two trustees must each sign as administrator? In reviewing online followings I find some disparity. Some plans have one trustee signature appearing on the proper admin signature line, and the other on the plan sponsor line ( I think this was the most often used method on paper filings even though no one was technically signing as plan sponsor) . Some have one signature on the admin signature line and the other signature on the admin printed name line.
Or doesn't it really matter, as long as the two trustees have filing signer credentials it all works out?
Qualifying Event
OK, my wife and I signed up for a very expensive plan. Then, one week after my open enrollment ended, her work announced that they would be offering free insurance for her and her family. Does this count as a qualifying event? Should we be able to opt out of my insurance?
FEES
If the Recordkeeper will be increasing a plans administrative fees next year and these fees are paid by the plan participants and allocated gross per capita. Is there any legal requirement to notify the participants of this change in fees?
Early Retirement Reductions?
Hello ![]()
I am wondering if there are any IRS regulations on point, and if most plans reduce for early retirement in the same manner as the following plan provision? The plan administrator interprets the provision to mean that there are NO partial years for an early retirement reduction. Therefore, if you are 55 and 11/12th, you have a reduction factor of 10 (assuming 65 NRA), instead of 9 1/12th. Basically, they round up. Is that ok?
"An eligible Participant's monthly early retirement benefit shall be equal to his Accrued Benefit on the date of his early retirement; provided, however, that if the sum of the Participant's age and years of Service as of his Annuity Starting Date does not equal at least 85, the amount of such benefit shall be reduced by the smaller of (i) 2 1/2 percent for each year or fraction thereof by which his age on his Annuity Starting Date precedes age 65 or (ii) 2 1/2 percent for each year or fraction thereof by which the sum of his age and years of Service at his Annuity Starting Date is less than 85."
Administrative Fees
If the Recordkeeper will be increasing a plans Administrative fees next year and these fees are paid by the plan participants and allocated gross per capita. Is there any legal requirement to notify the participants of this change in fees?
Schedule SB questions
Question 1: Is a change in PPA interest rate basis (e.g. changing from Jan 2008 seg rates for 2008 to November 2008 seg rates or November fyc for 2009) considered a change in funding method per line item 25 on 2009 Sched SB??
Question 2: Besides the pdf files of the Sched SB and each individual attachment, in what format does the Sched SB need to be completed for actual efiling? We only prepare the SB for our clients, we do not prepare the Form 5500 so we can't prepare an xml file for uploading. We had been sending the pdf files and it turns out our clients are manually entering the Sched SB data when filing the 5500 and that's never a good thing. Can anyone in this situation provide any help?
Responses are greatly appreciated.






