- 2 replies
- 1,626 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,206 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,138 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,086 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,271 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,167 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 768 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,640 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,872 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,220 views
- Add Reply
- 7 replies
- 3,601 views
- Add Reply
- 9 replies
- 2,949 views
- Add Reply
- 7 replies
- 2,023 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,029 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,125 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,605 views
- Add Reply
- 10 replies
- 3,116 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,709 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,509 views
- Add Reply
- 11 replies
- 4,059 views
- Add Reply
Safe Harbor Match
A 501©(3) client wishes to implement a Safe Harbor Match in their 403(b) program. However, they also wish to exclude an identifiable class of non-highly compensated employees from receiving the match.
Can they do this?
If not, can they set up a second 403(b) plan just for those employees?
Thank you.
Flexible Spending Accounts & Disability Leave
We have an employee going on disability leave in late December who has also elected the Flex Spending Account for 2009. We will not be able to deduct any of the pretax contributions since their will not be a paycheck in 2009 (while the employee is on leave). Should the employee pay us with after tax dollars (check) so they can access the entire annual election for 2009? They probably will return to work in March.
Plan Termination - Late Distribution
A small non-pbgc db plan terminated December 31, 2007
The plan sponsor initially did not want to get a D letter but we finally convinced them to.
If the submission is done now, we may not get the letter for up to eight months and they would prefer not to pay benefits until they receive the favorable letter.
1) If benefits are not paid until after 12/31/2008, are they in danger of the plan not being considered terminated because more than a year has gone by?
2) Since the plan terminated in 2007, PPA segment rates are not used for 417(e) purposes. Instead, the old stability period, look back month and 30 year treasury rate is used. What would happen if we drifted well into 2009 before benefits were paid? I guess the 30 year treasury rates will still be published.
Plan terminations; what do you have to do? Other than accelerated vesting and amending the plan? When you terminate a retirement plan, other than ac
Plan terminations; what do you have to do? Other than accelerated vesting and amending the plan?
When you terminate a retirement plan, other than accelerated vesting and amendment of the plan, what other requirements occur?
Election Apply FSCOB
Any comments regarding appropriateness and completeness of the contemplated form would be appreciated.
"last day of the Plan Year Ending on or after question"; so if the plan year ended on March 30, 2005, you have only five days?
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/epnf_021605.pdf
Notice 2005-5 provided that plans with mandatory distributions must be amended to include the automatic rollover provisions by the end of the first plan year ending on or after March 28, 2005.
This refers to amendment process for 401(a)(31).
Amending plan for EGTRRA, GUST, 401(a)(9) and 401(a)(31); what circumstances allow one to go beyond the usual due dates for execution and what serve
Amending a plan for EGTRRA, GUST, 401(a)(9) and 401(a)(31); what circumstances allow one to go beyond the usual due dates for execution and what serve as the required execution dates?
Did Datair write an article regarding this?
Age 59 1/2 employee rollover of 403(b) $$ into same employer's 401(k)?
Forgive my innocence (I prefer that word to ignorance). I didn't find a specific previous post addressing this question.
I can't see any reason why an age 59 1/2 employee couldn't take a 403(b) distribution in the form of a rollover to the same employer's 401(k) (assuming 401(k) eligibility assuming the 401(k) accepts rollovers, and assuming only 'eligible' amounts are rolled over). But I'm new to 403(b)s.
Am I missing something?
410(b) testing of 403(b) and 401(k) plans of related entities
My clients consist of 2 related entities. One entity is a 501©(3) organization, which maintains a 403(b) plan. The other is a for-profit entity, which maintains a 401(k) plan. The plans are identical and provide for elective deferrals, matching contributions and employer nonelective contributions.
Under Reg. Sec. 1.410(b)-6g, I can exclude the employees of the 501©(3) organization in the coverage testing for the elective deferral and matching contribution components of the 401(k) plan.
My question is: can I exclude the employees of the 501©(3) organization when I perform coverage testing of the employer nonelective contribution in the 401(k) plan as well?
Setting up more than one HSA for spouses
My wife and I both work for the same company and we have a HDHP with HSA as our option. Our employer is offering an HSA contribution of $400 for individuals and $800 for all other coverages (ee + spouse, ee + kids, family.) I am thinking that it's in our best interest to split the plan where I will cover the kids ($800 ER contribution) and she will get her own coverage ($400) contribution. The contribution we have to pay is actually cheaper that way as well - rather than me covering the family.
I have a few questions about this approach:
1.) If we each decided to contribute to our own HSA's, would we be able to contribute the maximum for both of us? In other words, could she put away the Max individual contribution while I put away the max family contribution?
2.) I understand that our out of pocket max could be much higher in this approach if we both have significant medical costs but are there any other downsides to this approach.
I appreciate your thoughts.
Plan Terminations and AFTAP
At the office, a few of us have said at different times that once a plan terminates the AFTAP requirements no longer apply and the ability to pay out lump sums is not restricted by funding status. However, when pressed, none of us can find a cite for that opinion and only talk about informal guidance we heard somewhere.
Does anyone have a cite for this view, or against it?
Sole Beneficiary of Father's IRA wishes to divide the IRA among siblings without incurring a taxable event
A daughter was named sole beneficiary on one of her father's IRA's and she wishes to divide the IRA equally among her 6 siblings and herself. She wants to do this without incurring a tax liability to herself in the process. Does anyone know how this can be accomplished? I am not very familiar with IRA situations such as this one and am not having any luck with my research.
Thanks so much!
Sandy
Confused on 403(b) Basics in 2009
I am suffering from a severe mental block with the impending changes toward 403(b) Plans. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
1) A Not-For-Profit has a deferral only 403(b) Plan. (There is no employer contribution.) Employer allows people to use any "TSA Product" or "Custodial Account" for deposit of deferrals. Is this Plan considered to be exempt from ERISA and the 5500 Filing; meaning, the only concern would be to get a plan document? Would this Plan need to file any form of 5500?
2) A Not-For-Profit has a deferral only 403(b) Plan. There is no employer contribution. Employer does require that people only use the Annuity or Custodial Account of a specific vendor. Is this Plan considered to be exempt from ERISA and 5500 Filing, or does this Plan now need to file a complete 5500 with Schedule I or Schedule H as would a 401(k)?
3) A Not-For-Profit has deferrals and employer contribution under their 403(b). Employer requires people use only the Annuity or Custodial Account of a specific vendor. Starting in 2009 must this Plan file a complete 5500 with Schedule I or Schedule H, as would a 401(k)?
I am having problems determining what causes a 403(b) to file a 5500, and what the "form" of filing that would be. Again, thanks.
premium only plan safe harbor
Does a cafeteria plan that offers only two choices (dental coverage, vision coverage) qualify as a premium only plan? I'm trying to fit within the premium only plan safe harbor for nondiscrimination testing.
In the proposed regs, premium only plan is defined as a "cafeteria plan that offers as its sole benefit an election between cash . . . and payment of the employee share of the employer-provided accident and health insurance premium (excludible from the employee's gross income under section 106)."
Attempted 401(k) Contribution
I have a situation where an employee wrote a check as an attempted contribution to his 401(k) plan. Only salary deferrals are allowed as contributions, thus he can't contribute this money. The employer cashed the check but did not contribute it to his 401(k) account. They finally realized they had the money a few months later and are returning it to him plus interest. My question is: is this interest taxable compensation to the employee (now former employee), does the employer have to withhold on the interest for FICA, Federal Inc. tax, local tax etc?
Thanks
-C
former HSA plan participant in non-HSA plan for 2008
I have someone who signed up for our HSA plan in 2007 and switched to 1 of our non-HSA plans for 2008
He is withdrawing any copays, deductible , etc.. out of HSA for 2008 medical expenses
I am assuming that is ok but just wanted to check that he didn't need to be enrolled in a high-deductible health plan for 2008
Can someone refer to me to some good resources on HSA's/HRA's/limited FSA's
thanks
Employer contribution to HSA
My employer contributes 1250 to HSA for 2009. The amount is contributed on 1/1/2009.
Say I terminate employment on 1/15/2009.
Will I have excess contributions subject to excise tax?
Will my employer get some of that money back?
ERISA Mash
ERISA Mash
I was looking at the -Link late one night
When my eyes beheld an eerie sight
For our Sieve from his lurk began to post
And suddenly to my surprise
He wrote the mash
He wrote ERISA mash
ERISA mash
It was a B-Link smash
He wrote the mash
I understood in a flash
He wrote the mash
He wrote ERISA mash
From my notebook at home or my PC beast
To message boards where benefit geeks feast
The posts all came from their humble abodes
k2retire is—has—the answer
They post the mash
They post ERISA mash
ERISA mash
It was an HR smash
They post the mash
Solve audits in a flash
They post the mash
They post ERISA mash
The lurkers were having fun
The debate had just begun
Posters included Tom Poje
Kevin C and GBurns
The Board was rockin', all were digging in regs
Austin on line, backed by a few CPAs
Then “Blinky the 3-eyed Fish”
Answered all those TPAs
They played the mash
They played ERISA mash
ERISA mash
It was an HR smash
They played the mash
Understood in a flash
They played the mash
They played ERISA mash
Logging on, mjb was keyboarding
Seems he had to ask just one thing
He began his post and rhetorically wrote
"Are you saying a plan can loan without a note?"
It's now the mash
It's now ERISA mash
ERISA mash
It's an employee smash
It's now the mash
HR answers in a flash
It's now the mash
It's now ERISA mash
Now everything's cool, JanetM’s posting
And ERISA mash is the hit of the land
For ex-spouses, this mash was meant too
When you get an order, say QDROphile sent you
Then you can mash
Then you can ERISA mash
ERISA mash
And do compliance smash
Then you can mash
Audit over in a flash
Then you can mash
Then you can ERISA mash
ADP refunds after full balance already distributed
How do you handle this in operation. The plan terminates in December and pays out balances ASAP. The ADP test is run after all this and plan fails so distributions are required. Well, distributions have already been made and 1099R issued. Seems to me the 1099R has to reflect that a portion of that distribuiton is not eligible for rollover because ADP test failed? This makes for very unhappy HCEs. Suggestions? What am I missing?
401(k) Plan Merger
Hello,
I was hoping someone could help with some guidance on the following scenario - our TPA is not sure & I am at wit's end trying to find an answer to this. Any help is greatly appreciated:
Company A purchased 80% of the stock of Company B on 01/01/07. Both A and B maintained separate 401(k) plans after the purchase. Effective 8/01/08 the employees of B became employees of A, and Company B is dissolved. The plan is to transfer the plan assets of Company B to Company A's plan before the end of ‘08. The former Company B employees are allowed to make elective contributions to Company A's Plan beginning 8/01/08. The question is: If Company A does a discretionary match for ’08, does it have to match the former Company B employees wages for the entire year or just for the period of time they were employed by Company A and were allowed to contribute to Company A's plan? There was no match for the Company B employees made on their old plan for 07.






