Jump to content

    cash balance vesting

    abanky
    By abanky,

    this may be a remedial question, but can a cb plan have a vesting schedule that isn't as good as a 3 year cliff? (1-25%, 2-50%, 3-75%, 4-100%)


    PBGC Waiver of Underpayment Penalty

    Guest Guy Incognito
    By Guest Guy Incognito,

    Does anyone have any experience with the PBGC and waiver of penalties for underpayment of penalties? Is waiver granted freely or do they strictly interpret their reasonable cause guidance?


    Do I need an SMM?

    waid10
    By waid10,

    Hi. We are adding a few procedures as covered under our health plan. Our plan document does not state specifically what health procedures are and are not covered under the Plan. However, the SPD does go into that. Do I need to send out and SMM? When does it have to be sent?


    Does a one participant defined benefit plan need a Summary Plan Description?

    RayJJohnsonJr
    By RayJJohnsonJr,

    Does a one participant defined benefit plan need a Summary Plan Description?


    Excess contributions to SEP

    Guest ple-rj
    By Guest ple-rj,

    Excess contributions have been discovered for an SEP plan. There has been no Form 5329 completed for any prior years. The questions I have are:

    1. Are there any penalties that will exist?

    2. How should I correct this?

    3. How many years must I go back to adjust?


    New 412(i) class action

    Guest edm32
    By Guest edm32,

    Attached is a class action complaint regarding allegedly abusive 412(i) plans. It was filed against Indy Life, Hartford, PacLife, American General, ECI, and Kenny Hartstein.

    08.02.12_Berry_Complaint_Class_Action.pdf


    NQDC Education

    MSN
    By MSN,

    Does anyone know of a good source of information on NQDC plans other than the NQDC Answer Book?


    SIMPLE IRA and another plan?

    Guest PMiller
    By Guest PMiller,

    Our local library is considering a SIMPLE IRA plan. Currently, they have 1 employee making pre-tax contributions to a non-ERISA 403(b) with a mutual fund family. Does the fact that this 403(b) arrangement exists prevent them from setting up a plan this year since the sponsor can't make contributions to another qualified plan in the same year? Thanks.


    OPM

    Guest BED
    By Guest BED,

    Is anyone else having problems with OPM processing division orders resulting from a divorce for benefits that are already in a pay status? I have three orders with OPM, some since the summer of 2007, that have not been processed. When we finally contact someone at OPM, the answer is always the same. OPM claims not to have a certified copy of the order, etc, etc, etc. Does anyone know how to contact someone at OPM who really knows what's going on?


    Employer holding on to my 401k

    Guest dillybar
    By Guest dillybar,

    my friend was terminated from her job because she embezzeled company funds. She has not been charged to date. So she closed her 401k but the check was mailed to the employer. Who is holding the check until he does the research to fine out if he can legally keep it as a repayment.

    So does anyone know if the company can do this.

    Or, if the company can just hold the check until the case goes to court.


    PS Cont. Allocation-signed document and unsigned restatement

    Guest Emily 401(k)
    By Guest Emily 401(k),

    Hello--

    I recentely took over a plan and it appears the prior Administrator was using the original signed plan document to allocate the Profit Sharing Contribution each year. There is a restated document but the client never signed that document. The profit sharing allocation formulas are different. The original document has a comp. to comp. formula but the restated document has a cross tesed formula using 3 groups.

    Should the Administrator use an unsigned document or was he correct to use the original signed document. Please advise. Thanks.

    Emily


    Vendor Refund of Cafeteria Plan Money

    Guest Patkelley007
    By Guest Patkelley007,

    Any input on this situation is appreciated:

    Patient participates in his Employer's Cafeteria Plan, and saves enough money for $3,000 elective eye procedure. Patient has eye procedure performed by Doctor, and pays using Cafeteria Plan debit card. Patient is not satisfied with eye procedure, and Doctor agrees to refund the $3,000.

    First, when a cafeteria plan participant is due a refund, how is this usually handled? In this case, Doctor may be able to refund to the card that was used. What about a situation where a participant incurs charges and submits reimbursement requests... how would the refund be handled?

    Second, patient is upset, even if the money is credited back to debit card, that he will not be able to use it before March 15. Patient wants the $3,000 check directly; does not want it funneled back into the plan. Seems like patient has evaded tax on that money. Should Doctor issue a 1099? Should Doctor notify patient's employer? Any other solutions?

    Thanks for any help.


    MAGI affected by 401k/457?

    Guest gwargasm
    By Guest gwargasm,

    Sorry guys, I'm a noob. When trying to get a rough estimate of my MAGI, do I subtract my 401k and 457 contributions?

    for example, last year i made 119g but i also contributed 20g to my 457 and 401k. so am i automatically under the roth caps on MAGI?

    I can't get a straight answer out of anybody on this. I hope you can help. thanks


    Excess Roth IRA Contribution

    Guest IRA-Excess
    By Guest IRA-Excess,

    While preparing my Tax Year 2007 tax return, I just discovered I exceeded my tax Year 2006 Roth IRA contribution limit (limited by MAGI) by $570. I have read so many descriptions of how to correct this that I am completely lost. I have also exceeded my my 2007 limit, but I'm pretty clear about how to handle that prior to April 15, but cleaning up the previous year's situation has me confused. Any advice from someone who has navigated - or knows for sure how to navigate - this would be most appreciated.


    New 412(i) class action

    Guest edm32
    By Guest edm32,

    Last week, a class action lawsuit related to allegedly abusive 412(i) plans was filed in federal court in Dallas, Texas. The defendants include Indianapolis Life, Hartford, Pacific Life, American General, Economic Concepts, and Kenny Hartstein. A copy of the complaint is attached.

    08.02.12_Berry_Complaint_Class_Action.pdf


    Voting shares in the suspense account

    katieinny
    By katieinny,

    The shares are not publicly traded. We're okay with participants voting their allocated shares for the pass-through-matters, but the plan currently says that the Trustee shall not vote the shares in the suspense account. We're thinking about amending the plan to change that provision so that the Trustee can determine how those shares are voted.

    We just want to make sure there isn't a prohibition against the Trustee voting those shares.


    Enhanced benefits at termination

    Young Curmudgeon
    By Young Curmudgeon,

    I have a plan that wants to add a provision that would add years of credit for benefit accrual, vesting and participation in the event of involuntary termination under certain circumstances.

    The benefit could result in a person with two years participation, receiving a seven years participation benefit and instantly becoming vested.

    The entire arrangement seems problematic.

    I see issues with benefits rights and features discrmination and I think it may be impossible to get this to pass the 411(b)-1 accrued benefit requirements.

    Even if we could pass a general test, is there a way around the 411(b)-1 issue?


    Part-time work reducing Accrued Benefit

    Guest AEA
    By Guest AEA,

    I feel like there should be a Code section or Treas regulation prohibiting this....

    Plan determines accrued benefit based on Average Compensation, which is the highest 60 months of compensation out of the last 120 months. Participant was a full-time employee who dropped to part-time employment when moved out of state in 2003 (works from home, coming into office once every few months for a few days). Because of the double pro-ration issue, the Plan credits the participant for full years of service, even though she does not have the required 2,000 hours, but uses actual plan year compensation. As of June, the participant's part-time years will outnumber her full-time years during the last 120 months. Since she earns less as a part-time employee, her Accrued Benefit will begin going down from where it was when she worked full-time (because of her lower average compensation, even though her years of service have continued to increase). There has been no plan amendment and the employer did not force her to continue working on a part-time basis -- her choice. However, is the higher level of Accrued Benefit that she "earned" when she had full-time employment (and a higher salary) protected? Must the Plan pay her at least the amount she would have paid if she had quit while still employed full-time? If yes, what is the legal basis for this? I have looked all over Code section 411....

    One suggestion made for the Plan is to amend the months counted from the last 120 months to the last 180 months or more.


    IRS Audit Triggers

    Young Curmudgeon
    By Young Curmudgeon,

    Does anyone know what the current hot issues for the IRS? Do they still generally audit plan years where a plan merger took place?


    Defined Benefit Church Plan

    John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA
    By John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA,

    Since this is a church plan which has not elected to be subject to ERISA, is double proration therefore allowable?

    ERISA §2530.204-2(d) Prohibited double proration

    (1) In the case of a defined benefit plan that (i) defines benefits on a basis which has the effect of prorating benefits to reflect less than full-time employment or less than maximum compensation and (ii) does not adjust less-than-full-time service to reflect the equivalent of full-time hours or compensation (as the case may be), the plan may not further prorate benefit accrual under section 204(b)(3)(B) of the Act and section 411(b)(3)(B) of the Code by crediting less than full years of participation, as would otherwise be permitted under paragraph © of this section. These plans must credit, except when service may be disregarded under section 204(b)(3)© of the Act and section 411(b)(3)© of the Code (relating to less than 1000 hours of service), less-than-full-time employees with a full year of participation for the purpose of accrual of benefits.

    1.401(a)(4)-12 under Section 414(s) compensation

    (4) Double proration of service and compensation. If a defined benefit plan prorates benefit accruals as permitted under section 411(b)(4)(B) by crediting less than full years of participation, then compensation for a plan year, 12-month period, or other specified period that is used to determine the amount of an employee's benefits under the plan will not fail to be section 414(s) compensation, merely because the amount of compensation for that period is adjusted to reflect the equivalent of full-time compensation to the extent necessary to satisfy the requirements of 29 CFR 2530.204-2(d) (regarding double proration of service and compensation). This adjustment is disregarded in determining whether the underlying definition of compensation used satisfies the requirements of section 414(s). Thus, for example, if the underlying definition of compensation is an alternative definition that must satisfy the nondiscrimination requirement of §1.414(s)-1(d)(3), in determining whether that requirement is satisfied with regard to the underlying definition, the compensation included for any employee is determined without any adjustment to reflect the equivalent of full-time compensation required by 29 CFR 2530.204-2(d).


Portal by DevFuse · Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use