- 5 replies
- 2,160 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,874 views
- Add Reply
- 20 replies
- 6,813 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,914 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,527 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,793 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,412 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,946 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,434 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 2,188 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,518 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,454 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,966 views
- Add Reply
- 7 replies
- 3,133 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,508 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 2,049 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,270 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,369 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 2,883 views
- Add Reply
retroactive benefit reduction
can a DB plan, w/ treasury approval, implement a retroactive benefit accrual reduction??
has anyone heard of such a thing and if yes, by what authority?
Money Purchase Termination
Not sure what happened with my first attempt to post this, but here's another try.
To what extent does the $5,000 consent rule apply to the termination of a money purchase plan? More specifically, if one or more participants with more than $5,000 do not consent to a distribution and the employer has another DC plan, must the money purchase plan remain in place until consent is given (or merge into the other plan), or can the plan purchase annuities for the participants?
Client forgot to remove deferrals from payck
A client contacted me earlier this week to let me know that they have not been removing deferrals from soneones paycheck - since January! The new firm administrator let this woman know about an plan meeting and the partiicpant mentioned the fact that no deferrals have been coming out of her check. ![]()
Anyway, as much as I want to go the "to bad, so sad" route, we are looking at EPCRS to fix this mess. I just got a copy of her enrollment form (which was sent to Hancock in a timly fashion) and she elected to defer $40 per pay. This plan has a safe harbor match with the 100% to 3% & 50% on the next 2%. I have a list of her gross pay per pay period, and it varies each period, but the $40 is around 3%.
Opinions:
Should the company make up the $40 for each pay plus the SHM? (citing 2006 TEOB page 15.647 Issue 16) OR
Should the company make up 50% of the deferral plus the SHM (Rev Proc 2006-27 Appendix A page 60 ©)
I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around the fact that this woman went months without noticing that she was not deferring........
Your thoughts are appreciated. ![]()
Receivables in Top Heavy test?
Life Insurance in DB PLan
Say we have a 1 participant DB plan.
Under 74-307 the maximum death benefit allowed is either:
1. The proceeds from a life insurance policy where the premium represents less than 50% of the total employer contribution, plus the amount of the auxiliary fund.
My understanding of the auxiliary fund is that it is essentially the total value of the side fund that is used to fund the retirement benefit. Is that correct?
Of course the death benefit must be at least as much as the QPSA, which in this plan's case is a 100% j&s of the AB (unreduced).
2. The maximum of
- 100 times the projected monthly benefit or
- the reserve (not the face amount above) plus the auxiliary fund
My understanding is that the Reserve is amount obtained from the insurance company. That is, the actuary doesn't compute it based on what he considers reasonable assumptions. Is that correct?
So the two questions pertain to the auxiliary fund and the reserves.
Thanks.
Discriminatory Self-Funded Medical Plan
I am wondering if any of you could opine as to the Service's level of enforcing nondiscrimination rules under 105(h) - specifically a waiver of eligibility waiting period for employees at the vice-president level or above, most of whom constitute highly compensated individuals.
I believe a goodly number of non-profit organizations maintain self-funded plans with provisions like these, which are common and permissible in fully insured arrangements. I am wondering if anyone has ever seen adverse tax consequences befall individuals in such arrangements.
401(k) Catch-Up Fiscal Year Plan
I am confused on the impact of an ADP test failure and catch-up recharacterization on future salary deferral contributions.
A 401(k) plan year ends on 9/30/06.
For calendar 2005 - the deferrals for an HCE (over 50) were $12,000. -
Also no catch-up due to ADP testing from the 9/30/05 Plan Year
For the period 10/1/05-12/31/05 deferrals for an HCE were $3,000.
For the period 1/1/06-9/30/06 deferrals for an HCE were $15,000.
For the plan year ending 9/30/06 the ADP test is failed and the maximum allowable deferral for testing is $13,000. Of the $18,000 deferred for the plan year $5,000 will be recharacterized as catch-up for 2006.
For the period 10/1/06-11/30/06 the participant has deferred another $5,000. Since he has already had $5,000 recharacterized as 2006 catch-up, how would these additional deferrals be treated? Would they need to be returned to him as excess contributions, if so, by what time, or could they remain in the plan since the total calendar year deferral remains under $20,000?
Can the deferrals be characterized as follows?
Non-Catch-up contributions from 1/1/06-9/30/06 - $10,000
Catch-up contributions from 1/1/06-9/30/06 - $5,000 - ADP test failure
Non-Catch-up contributions from 10/1/06-12/31/06 - $5,000
Distribution
Hi, I am just a regular person looking for information. I am 41 years old. I resigned from my employer a few years ago. I left behind a balance of $27,000 in my 401(k) Plan. I didn't do anything to roll it over or anything. I am now unemployed and need access to the money. Is there any way that I can get the money? If so, what types of penalties or fees will I pay?
Thanks.
Life ins contract in IRA
PSP will soon terminate. The PSP holds a "life ins contract" as one of the plan investments for participant X.
Can participant X roll her "life ins contract" from PSP to IRA ?
I've had some people (insurance agent , a high school bookkeeper, a minister, etc) tell me it is impossible, some say it can be done with difficulty, others say it's no problem.
I have never run across this situation before. Can anyone advise ?
Final 401(k) amendment for terminated plans
I've got a number of plans that terminated and paid out in 2006. Do they still need to sign a final 401(k) amendment?
I was under the impression that any plan that still had assets in 2006 had to do it, regardless of when the plan actually signed a termination resolution, but I've been hearing some say that's not the case...
Thanks!
Transfer of HSA Plan (Accounts)
Must members (participants) the hold HSA investment account receive a 30 day blackout notice is the investment provider is changed? I'm thinking along the same lines as the blackout notice with a conversion of a 401(k) Plan.
RFP
Can anyone direct me to a resource for a sample RFP for a 401(k) Plan? Really don't have the time or inclination to "reinvent the wheel" when I'm sure somebody's already got a good one.
Thanks!
Limiting investment in Employer Stock
Post-Enron there has been a tremendous amount of press regarding investments in employer stock through tax-qualified plans. As a result, many nervous 401(k) Plan committees are either terminating the investment option or limiting the option in fear of a decrease in the stock price - followed by litigation for breach of fiduciary duty. With that being said - what if a company has maintained an employer stock fund in its 401(k) Plan for several years and as a result of media pressure (not the returns on the fund) decides to limit participant investment in the fund to 25% of their deferrals (the limitation would be on a prospective basis). A year later the company is sold for 2X book value. Can the participant's sue the fiduciaries for breach here? If the only reason for limiting the investment was paternal (i.e. we can't trust you to diversify so we will force you to diversify by limiting your investment in the company stock) or because the company was afraid of a lawsuit. Is there a breach of fiduciary duty for "missed opportunity" on the part of the participants to share in the windfall? Any thoughts???
PTE for director who would provide investment services?
Does anyone know if a prohibited transaction exemption exists for a company director who would like to provide investment advice for the company's pension plan trust? The director is not a member of the plan committee and is not an employee of the company.
Which mortality table to use?
The IRS has blessed the mortality tables contained in IRC 404 regulations under Standard mortality tables. I seem to remember seeing something that also permitted the use of GATT and GAR. Am I mistaken and if not would someone please provide a cite.
Thanks in advance.
Special Enrollment Rights for Dependents of Retirees?
The HIPAA regs talk about special enrollment rights for dependents of "current employees." Do we have to give spec. enrollment rights to dependents of retirees?
Life Insurance in a DB plan
Are there standards or guidelines anywhere that determine the minimum adjustment to face amounts or the maximum "administrative delay" period before a new policy is issued for a new participant?
Example: Plan provides that life insurance is purchased equal to 100 X the anticipated death benefit. In year 2 the formula would call for a $10,000 increase in the death benefit. The agent says the minimum increase is $25,000. My impression was that an adjustment standard above $5,000 or so was not allowed, but I have yet to find this in print.
In year 2 a new participant enters 1/1 and insurance must be purchased. By when?
The plan document is silent on these matters other than that the insurance face amount must be 100 X.
Is there anything in print that addresses these issues?
Vesting changes
Ok do the new vesting changes HAVE to be 6 year graded or a 3 year cliff OR can they be just as generous? ![]()
Hot Stove Jeopardy for Red Sox Nation
The answer is: J.D. 'Nancy" Drew and Julio Lugo
Sample question:
1. What player signings by other teams might please Yankee fans?
Plan terminates but doesn't distribute all assets
Has anyone ever terminated a plan and not immediately distributed all of the plan's assets?
It has always been my understanding that a plan must complete distributions within an administratively feasible period of time following its termination or else it was considered to be an ongoing plan subject to qualification, funding and reporting requirements. Generally this means the plan must complete distributions within a year of its termination, but the plan may wait until it receives a favorable determination letter until making final distributions
However, the instructions to Form 5500 seem to contemplate a situation in which a plan terminates but does not distribute all its assets within a year.
Specifically, page 7 states:
"If the plan was terminated but all plan assets were not distributed, a return/report must be filed for each year the plan has assets. The return/report must be filed by the plan administrator, if designated, or by the person or persons who actually control the plan's assets/property."
Has anyone ever terminated a plan, but not distributed all of the assets? If so, how long have you kept assets in a plan after "terminating" the plan? Why did you keep some asset in the plan (were some assets illiquid)? Did the plan sponsor continue to keep the document up to date and file 5500s?









