- 3 replies
- 1,424 views
- Add Reply
- 8 replies
- 2,555 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,336 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,111 views
- Add Reply
- 10 replies
- 2,986 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,802 views
- Add Reply
- 13 replies
- 5,399 views
- Add Reply
- 20 replies
- 4,520 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,359 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 2,598 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 2,252 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,958 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,108 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 2,750 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 2,456 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,533 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,427 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 2,180 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,345 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,546 views
- Add Reply
"Unlinking" a wrap plan from a 401(k) plan
I have a question regarding the handling of a nonqualified wrap plan linked to a 401(k) plan. The current design calls for irrevocable deferrals into the nonqualified plan with a "pour over" at the end of the year into the 401(k) of the maximum amount possible. Because of the screwy 409A guidance that limits the amounts deferred under the nonqualified plan to the 402(g) limits, we want to "delink" the plans. Basically the thought would be to prohibit anyone who defers into the nonqualified plan for a year from making any change in his deferral election under the 401(k). However, I am concerned about the rule in the new 401(k) regs. that says that participants must have an effective opportunity to make (or change) an election at least once during each plan year. See Reg. Sec. 1.401(k)-1(e)(2)(ii). I think an argument can be made that those who elect to defer under the nonqualified plan voluntarily waive their right to make any change to the 401(k) deferral election for the upcoming year and this is not a violation of that rule. In effect, it is a voluntary choice made by the participant. Does anyone know whether the IRS has any viewpoint on this? Or does anyone have a better idea?
Looking for Ruling/Case Etc.
...understand that a QDRO is for a qualified plan- not an IRA…but I am looking for a specific case/ruling where it was specifically addressed ,that a QDRO that was issued for a qualified plan (QP)could not be used for the IRA to which the assets were rolled ( from the QP).
Thanks
Using Plan Assets to Pay Fees
To be more explicit, can a plan use assets from the forfeiture account to pay the 10% excise tax on failed ADP refunds?
Roth 401(k) -- Distributed to one beneficiary
Is it possible to design a plan that permits the participant to designate the portion (not necessarily percent) of the retirement balance that will be paid to a beneficiary.
Example, could the participant designate the Roth 401(k) subaccount will be distributed to the spouse and the balance to the child? (Let's forget spousal rules for now.)
Easy Q? Why Can't Partners Establish uni/solo-DB With SE Income?
Ok, this should be a very easy question to shoot down, but I searched this board and didn't find anything.
Partner of a service partnership gets K-1 and "friends" have told him he can set up a uni-DB plan with the self employment income. Partner particpates in the partnership 401(a) plan. Assume no income other than the k-1, but does that matter? Is it a 415 problem or an affiliated service group, etc. issue? I know it can't be possible because everyone would do it, but can't figure it out this morning.
Thanks!
Excess Deferrals - SIMPLE IRA
How are excess deferrals (excess of 12,000 limit, including catch up) treated in a SIMPLE IRA? Should they be refunded and a 1099 issued? Do penalties apply?
Decline to be Beneficiary?
Plan states death benefit payable to - the designated beneficiary, and if none, to the spouse, if no spouse to the participant's estate.
Unmarried participant dies. His brother is his named beneficiary. The deceased participant does have minor children. The beneficiary brother wants to know, can he now decline to be the beneficiary entitled to receive the death benefit and instead have the death benefit paid to the children? Or is the brother "stuck" with being the beneficiary and if he wants to provide the death benefit to the children he needs to explore other "gifting" type avenues?
service weighted allocation and the gateway test
A 401(k) plan has a non-elective component in which the employer makes a 1% of pay contribution to all participants with 10 or more years of service. The result is that out of 250+ plan participants, about 80 receive this contribution, with a mixture of about 30 HCEs and 50 NHCEs getting the contribution. Of the remaining 170 participants who do not get it, 25 are HCEs, the rest are NHCEs. I fail 410(b) but still pass 401(a)(4).
But, because I have NHCEs getting $0.00 non-elective, it would appear that I do not pass the 1/3 gateway allocation mark since I have NHCE's getting 0.00% and HCEs getting 1.00%. Is there an exception for this type of allocation method, which is uniform after so many years of service?
Thanks
Exclusion of eligible employees and QNEC's
An Employer improperly excluded several eligible employees from their 401(k) Plan for part of the year. The employer self corrects and contributes QNEC's for these employees. Should these QNEC's be included in the ADP/ACP testing? If so, do you include the whole QNEC or just the part that was for the missed contribution, and not the 'missed earnings'?
Thanks for any input.
Is a single participant plan an ERISA plan?
Is a Registered Investment Advisor an ERISA Fiduciary for assets held in a tax qualified profit sharing plan with a single owner/participant?
Severance from Employment
Company A sponsors a 401(k) plan. On January 1 most of Company A's assets are sold to Company B and former employees of Company A begin working for Company B (same job, same location etc..). Company B adopts Company A's 401(k) plan and the employees of Company B begin participating in Company A's plan again. If Company B eventually terminates the participation agreement with Company A's 401(k) will Company B's employees be able to take a distribution from the plan on the grounds that they had a separation from service with Company A? Keep in mind that they are still working for Company B. Would the distribution be limited to the amount they contributed as Company A employees since they are still working for Company B?
ADP testing
Employer's ADP test failed for 2005 using prior year testing. All employee are eligible to participate on date of hire.
The ADP test would pass if we carved out the otherwise excludable employees in 2004. I understand that if a plan uses prior year testing, the change to disaggregating the otherwise excludables doesn't help the first year because it's treated as a plan coverage change.
My question is since all employees are eligible, can't we just "declare" that disaggregating (for coverage) began in 2003, which would allow us to use the disaggregated 2004 NHCE ADP for 2005 HCE testing?
Coverage passes automatically regardless of whether we disaggregate.
I hope this makes sense to someone.
Money Purchase to Profit Sharing (k)
Employer currently has a MPP. Plan year is 10-1 to 9-30. Employer contribution is 3% to be made at the end of the plan year (9-30-06). Employees have already accrued a right to the allocation formula for the current plan year.
Employer wants to establish a 401(k) plan - let's say 5-1-06 (keep the plan year the same as MPP). .
Can the MPP be amended into a 401(k) plan 5-1-06 and make sure that the 3% contribution previously provided by the "MPP" be carried forward in the 401(k) - perhaps via a 3% safe harbor nonelective? Participants won't lose out on the 3% since that will be required under the 401(k). Or, since the MPP is a pension plan subject to minimum funding etc. the 3% must be contributed to the "pension" plan and not to a PSP?
Is the alternative to keep the MPP though 9-30-06, start up a 401(k) as of 4-1-06 with just 'EE deferrals ('ER can't afford to contribute to both plans) and then merge the MPP into the 401(k) as of the end of 9-30-06?
Timing of discretionary amendments
According to Rev Proc 2005-66, an employer is considered to have timely adopted a discretionary plan amendment if the amendment is adopted by the end of the plan year in which it is effective. However, for minimum funding, Code section 412©(8) permits a retroactive amendment up to 2-1/2 months after the end of the plan year. Has the IRS indicated whether an amendment made during the Code section 412©(8) period will be considered "timely adopted" for purposes of Rev Proc 2005-66?
top heavy status successor plan
I am drawing a blank.
The Co. AB plan covered employees of both Co. A & Co. B. Co. A & Co. B were part of a controlled group in 2005. No longer controlled in 2006. Co. B employees are spun off into the Co. B retirement plan. It is my understanding Co. B plan would be successor plan for ADP/ACP purposes, but is it the same for top heavy? Do I determine 2006 top heavy status for the Co. B plan by looking back to the 2005 results for Co. AB plan or this treated as a new plan & look to the end of the first plan year for Co. B plan? I really can't find any clear guidance.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Roth IRA excess contribution
Hi,
In 2005 I added 4000$ to my existing roth IRA in scottrade. My existing roth IRA has 8K all invested in mutual funds. I didn't do anything with the 4K and it just sat there, not earning anything. Now when filing the taxes I realized I can't contribute due to exceeding income limits. I requested withdrawal of the excess of 4K. Scottrade sent me a check for 4666 666 being the earnings. They said during the time the account had grown from 12K to 14K due to gains in mutual funds. So 2K*4/12 = 666 is the earnings on 4K.
I don't think this is right. The 8K would have earned 2K whether or not I had put in the 4K. The 4K didn't earn anything, so shouldnt I just be getting 4K?
I spoke to IRS on their phone line and they agreed, but scottrade is not convinced. What should I do? Who is right?
The kicker here is overall I am still at a loss of $100 in my IRA, so don't want to pay taxes on 666$ and accumulate 766$ loss in my IRA! I am thinking of just withdrawing everything so that I dont have to pay any taxes, but somehow think maybe thats not such a good idea, there has to be a better way. Such a huge penalty for being a dedicated investor setting aside a small amount for roth ira?
thanks
Roth IRA conversion tax loss
I converted a traditional IRA to a Roth in 1999, invested in tech stocks, and still have a paper loss of more than $5000. I want to take an un-qualified distribution, and subsequent tax loss. I understand that I must close out all Roth IRAs. Do I need to close my non Roth accounts? How do I close my Roth accounts so the statements reflect my loss, not an un-qualified taxable distribution? Thanks for your help, bob
Overpayment of Safe Harbor Match
I'm looking at a case that had a standard Safe Harbor Match (SHMAT) for 2005. That is, the plan was to match deferrals dollar for dollar up to 3%, and then, 50 cents on the dollar on the next two percent.
The sponsor misunderstood the match formula. They thought the formula was dollar for dollar up to 4% of pay.
Wouldn't you know it - almost all of the employees deferred exactly 4%. The employer made a 4% match, even though these participants should only have gotten a 3.5% match.
This kind of error must happen all of the time. Does any one know of (a) IRS sanctioned self - correction , or (b) practical suggestions?
Thanks very much.
Stocks in a roth ira
If you have stocks in a roth ira and you sell them and make a profit how long do the proceeds have to remain in the account? Does the five year rule come into play?
early withdrawl penalty
I filed my tax returns and did not include my early withdrawl form of $10,500, which was sent to me after i had already filed my taxes for the year, what will happen now. I took the money out as a loan and it went into default, and didnt report it? what will happen please help, I though in the letter they sent me that i had to report it at the end of 2006, not 2005





