- 1 reply
- 1,052 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 5,724 views
- Add Reply
- 10 replies
- 2,891 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,398 views
- Add Reply
- 6 replies
- 2,535 views
- Add Reply
- 7 replies
- 3,120 views
- Add Reply
- 3 replies
- 1,818 views
- Add Reply
- 0 replies
- 1,056 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,952 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,467 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 983 views
- Add Reply
- 15 replies
- 2,186 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 1,278 views
- Add Reply
- 8 replies
- 2,340 views
- Add Reply
- 4 replies
- 1,680 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,624 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,324 views
- Add Reply
- 5 replies
- 1,294 views
- Add Reply
- 1 reply
- 17,235 views
- Add Reply
- 2 replies
- 1,213 views
- Add Reply
Can I still contribute for 2003
Hi I'm new here. I am wondering if I can still contribute to a ROTH for 2003 tax years. I have no other retirement funds for 2003.
Thanks
Terry
What happens to COBRA in rehire situation?
Here's the scenario...Employee was laid off and elected COBRA. A few months later employee is rehired, and he wants to elect coverage under the employer's health plan as an active employee. (Coverage is totally voluntary, and paid completely by the employee.)
I need to know what happens to the COBRA coverage when the employee elects coverage as an employee. We are facing situations where sometimes the preexisting condition limitation period is satisfied, and sometimes there's a remaining limitation period.
One of the conditions under which COBRA coverage will end (according to the federal regs) is the first date after the date of the election upon which the QB is covered under any group health plan THAT IS NOT MAINTAINED BY THE EMPLOYER. This condition appears to prevent termination of COBRA coverage if the group health plan election is made through the same employer that provides COBRA coverage.
The subject group health plan pays stated dollar amounts for health care services and does not contain a COB provision, so we are concerned about double coverage. We do, however, have a provision in the eligibility section of the policy that states that no one may be covered more than once under the policy. If we can't force the employee to drop COBRA coverage, this may be our "out" for not providing both COBRA coverage and coverage as an active employee.
Any insight would be most appreciated! (And sorry to be so long-winded!)
BenefitsLink Message Boards Acronyms
Most are familiar with email acronyms such as LOL, IMO, BTW, FYI, etc.
I got to thinking that BenefitsLink posters could save a lot of typing (and possible carpal tunnel syndrome) if some BenefitsLink acronyms were adopted. For example:
CPP - This topic has already been discussed ad nauseum. Use the forums search capabilities and check prior posts.
PD - What does the plan document say? OR You must follow the plan document? OR Have you read/referred to the plan document? OR It depends on the plan document? etc.
LC - You should obtain competent legal counsel on this matter. OR Sorry, you're going to have to pay for this advice. OR You may already be in a lot of trouble!
These seem to be the three most popular responses. Any other suggestions?
(P.S. Please do not take this post too seriously. It is all in good fun.)
certificates of creditable coverage
I seem to recall a previous thread that discussed this but I need someone to point me in the right direction. When a company that offers health insurance to its employees changes insurance companies, are there any certificate of creditable coverage obligations by any party? I say no cert of creditable coverage, because coverage is not lost. The new insurance company is requesting for pre-ex purposes. Can't they get this information from the employer without a cert?
Cross-tested PS Plan with safe-harbor 401(k)
I am cross-testing a profit sharing contribution to a plan that has a 401(k) safe harbor match. There are employees (nonexcludible) that terminated during the plan year that did not meet the 1000 hour requirement for an allocation and they did not defer any compensation (ie no match). Do these employees have to receive a gateway contribution?
My understanding is that they did not benefit under the plan and no gateway is required. If the safe-harbor was a nonelective 3% and they were eligible to defer, then the gateway would be required.
Compensation Exclusions
A plan excludes OT, Bonus, Comm. The plan is 401(k) and pay period match only. I ran compensation ratio test - plan fails - NHCE inclusion % = 80%
HCE inclusion % = 100%
I tried testing 401(k) and match contributions under 401(a)(4) but plan does not pass ABPT - only 67%.
What can I do for this plan? Does the employer have to do a QNEC to pass 401(a)(4)?
Can I amend the plan to not exclude these compensation items within 9 1/2 months after plan year end? If I amend, plan do I just run ADP / ACP on gross compensation or does the employer have to still make some sort of employer contribution becuase NHCE's did not get to contribute or receive match on gross pay in 2003?
Any thoughts would be helpful.
QNEC Question
Our current document provides that:
The Employer may make Qualified Nonelective Employer Contributions. The Employer shall contribute on behalf of all eligible Non-Highly Compensated Participants eligible for an allocation, a contribution equal to the amount, if any, as necessary to satisfy the Actual Deferral Percentage limitation and/or Contribution Percentage limitation. Such contribution shall be allocated first to the lowest paid Non-Highly Compensated Participant up to 25% of Section 415 Compensation, then to the next lowest paid Non-Highly Compensated Participant until the Actual Deferral Percentage limitation and/or Contribution Percentage limitation is satisfied.
Is it possible to amend the document to provide that "such contribution shall be allocated first to the lowest paid Non-Highly Compensated Participant up to 100% of Section 415 Compensation..." or would that exceed the overall deduction contribution limit?
Military Leave - Tax treatment of made up contributions for prior years.
For someone who wishes to make up missed deferrals while on a 6 month leave in 2003, are those deferrals reported on his 2004 w2 along with his "regular" deferrals made in 2004? Or would he have to file an amended 2003 return? In our case, he would end up with a total of about $19k total deferred. Still working with our recordkeeper on how they will account for the made up deferrals, given the limits built into their system.
Safe Harbor Plan Deemed not top heavy
I just want to confirm what I believe to be true.
A plan is a SH 401(k) plan that is top heavy. For the plan year, the only contribution made is the 3% NEC, however, DOP compensation is used so that several participants do not get 3% of full-year pay (required if the plan were considered for top heavy). I presume this is okay since the plan is treated as not top heavy.
However, if additional contribuitons were made, then the new entrants would need to get the 3% full top heavy contribution.
Can someone please confirm that this is how they understand it as well.
Many thank ![]()
pre tax treatment of HSA contributions?
If we have a POP plan, can we also pre-tax contributions to employee HSA accounts? We're in the process of setting up the POP.
Do we need to upgrade to a different type of Cafeteria plan to include the HSA? We don't want the dependent care and FSA.
Status Change Effective in Previous Calendar Year
We have an employee who had a child on 12/31/03. On 1/12/04, the employee contacted us to make a change to the Health FSA based on the status change.
We make the increase he requested for the 2004 FSA election, but he is now arguing the point that he should be allowed to make an increased FSA contribution for 2003, even though payroll for the 2003 year was over and one with by the time he made his status change election.
His opinion is that the tax benefit to the employee (salary reductions) and source of funding need not occur within the same year.
In practical terms, any status change after Dec 15 could never be made, since payroll withholding of an additional amount could not be accomplished before the end of the year. He is stating that this does not agree with the intent of IRC 125 and TR 1.125-4.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks.
Catch up example - please help me understand
Plan year = 08/01/02 - 07/31/03
Plan allows salary deferrals up to 20% of compensation
Compensation is measured on a PY basis
Plan allows for catch up contributions
My ADP test is failing and I have two participants over age 50 with the following contribution amounts:
A - compensation = $117,000
contributions = $15,139
contributions deposited 01/01/02 - 12/31/02 = $11,000 of which $7,040 was contributed from 08/01/02 - 12/31/02. $8,099 was contributed from 01/01/03 - 07/31/03.
B - compensation = $109,418
contributions = $14,025.35
contributions deposited 01/01/02 - 12/31/02 = $12,000 of which $1,068.97 was contributed from 08/01/02 - 12/31/02. $12,956.38 was contributed from 01/01/03 - 07/31/03.
For the plan year, can you please help me determine if any of the contributions included above can be treated as catch up contributions?
I will admit up front that I have probably left out some important information, so please be kind with your analysis and I will provide any additional information that is required. Thanks.
Deadline for GUST SPD
Plan was amended for GUST effective April 1, 2003, with a March 31 Plan Year end. What is deadline for SPD to be given out? Thanks!
Accrued To Date Method
Have a small profit sharing plan (10 participants) that requires employees to be employed on the anniversary date of the plan to receive a contribution. One of the participants terminated employment prior to year end with 750 hours and therefore did not receive a contribution. However, this participant did receive contributions for the past three years (i.e. he has an account balance).
We are using the accrued to date method when testing for 401(a)(4). Is it correct that he should have an accrual rate even though he did not benefit this year?
Thanks.
Partial Termination?
Company A is a fully owned subsidary of a large corporation. Company A sponsors a plan with approximately 2,000 participants.
One entire location of 100 participants is being closed. Of the 100 participants less than 10 are being offered a position at another locaiton.
Does this qualify as a partial termination for the 90+ participants that are being terminated without an opportunity to complete their vesting?
Again, Inherited IRA Question
I searched for and read the archived messages of the recent past about inherited IRAs... Seems to be a continuing trouble spot. So here we go again....
I have this situation: Mother with Trad. IRA dies in 1999, RBD was 4/1/1994. No living spouse. She named her two children as primary beneficiaries. Each child has taken RMDs each year starting in 2000. Now one beneficiary wants to transfer her portion to another custodian. Our organization cannot and would not open an IRA for a deceased person. I know PLRs have clearly stated a beneficiary cannot rollover his or her portion, however, ttee to ttee transfers are permitted.
Does this mean the transfer can be made to an IRA in the decedent's name that was preexisting at death (another inherited IRA) or are there custodians out there who will open an IRA in the name of a decedent?
Our policy now is we will do the transfer provided the new custodian acknowledges the IRA is in the decedent's name and that they will accept the inherited IRA. We also require the beneficiary to execute a hold harmless letter since our position is that this is a grey area with the IRS and we believe the transaction is not approved by the IRS.
Can anyone enlighten me further on this issue? Any information is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
FAS 87/132 Disributions
FAS isn't one of my strong points. Regarding distributions, i understand distributions weighted for timing and actual distributions. However, i'm a little confused about expected distributions and the interest on them. Are expected distributions only for retired participants in pay status?? and is the interest on expected distributions only on those distributions or is the interest on the expected distributions the interest on the weighed distributions. Please help!! thanks.
penalty for catch-up
If controlled group member #1 amends its plan for catch up but controlled group member 2 does not until a following plan year, what is the penalty?
Coverage Change During Inpatient Stay
Can anyone tell me what should happen when a patient has an insurance coverage change during the time he/she is admitted to the hospital? Does the coverage in effect at the time of admittance cover until the patient is discharged? Or should coverage change on the effective date of the change? What about if there is a change in the insurance company?
It would seem logical that the coverage and company should stay in effect until discharge. Seems I recall policies stating that employees or dependents who are hospitalized at the time the policy, or policy change, becomes effective, are not covered until discharged.
Now for the kicker. Is this covered by State regs, federal regs or other? A cite would be helpful?
tks
Ronc
Privacy Issues as relates to TPA
As a TPA we receive much confidential information about plan participants. (SS#, address, etc). Does anyone know if it is required or advisable to include some type of disclosure or privacy statement in information we provide to our clients?
Thanks!











