Jump to content

    What is w-2 salary

    Jakyasar
    By Jakyasar,

    Sorry if this was asked before, cannot seem to find it

    This is for 2021

    W-2 box 1 100,000

    W-2 box 5 90,000

    W-2 box 14 - other - 2% SH 10,000 - this is the difference between box 1 and box 5

    What is the 2021 salary for pension purposes?

    Thank you

     


    QDRO never filed, divorce finalized 12 years ago

    Denise050512
    By Denise050512,

    My husbands first marriage ended in divorce and finalized on 3/2/10.  His ex wife never filed a QDRO in Pennsylvania and now has contacted an attorney to start the process.

     

    Because of her untimeliness, what are my husband's rights?


    Lifetime Income Illustrations - What is the formula?

    MrsMacias
    By MrsMacias,

    I have been searching and searching the regs and IFR for this to no avail. I understand what data pieces need to be used to generate the lifetime income illustration but what is the formula to generate the monthly payments. I imagine it must be so easy that no one else is asking because I do not see it. If I get a question from a client on how the monthly payment was calculated I need to be able to provide that. I've reviewed the standard annuity formulas but those do not seem to be what I am looking for because they require you to know what the monthly payment will be. 


    Late PBGC Form 500

    Dalai Pookah
    By Dalai Pookah,

    Plan is terminating 12/31/XXX0. Files 5310, but much later (more than 180 days after termination date) files Form 500 with PBGC. IRS approves 5310 submission, with 12/31/XXX0 termination date in XXX2. PBGC comes back and says termination date must be 12/31/XXX1 because Form 500 was filed more than 180 days after termination date.

    How do we reconcile this? There may be 4019a)(26) issues with the XXX1 year due to the additional of additional employees. What is the cure for filing Form 500 late? Do we need a XXX1 valuation?


    Stock sale - contribution

    PS
    By PS,

    Hi, 

    Plan is terminating due to stock sale - the sale date is 05/13, the plan will terminate by 05/12.  The term date is 5/12 (thurs)  and pay date is 5/13 (Fri) terminating plan will  deduct/withhold the contributions on 5/10  (tues) I believe they can still post to the term plan since the deductions were withheld prior to the term date correct? or is it pay date driven?

    Thanks


    last minute abrupt request

    SSRRS
    By SSRRS,
    Hi 
     
    We received the following request from an attorney representing our client (10/31 year end) that based on the request it seems the client is leaving us. The Request was made Wednesday afternoon (yesterday). Are we obligated to stop all that we are involved with and interrupt our scheduled meetings etc to provide them with this information on this last minute request? This is the first time we heard anything about this. And can they truly hold us responsible for penalties mentioned below? Thank you very much for any insights on this.
     
    "We need the following documents today, because we have to make a filing by Friday.
    Please send today. If we do not receive the documents, "client" will hold you accountable for any penalties, interest charges and damages, so please deal with this NOW.
     
    Thank you

    DB Plan

    ·         Most current plan document and all amendments thereto (the document should have been updated by July 31, 2021.

    ·         Most current SPD

    ·         actuarial report for plan years ending 10/31/2018, 10/31/2019  & 10/31/2020

    ·         census data for plan years ending 10/31/2019 & 10/31/2020

    ·         2021 AFTAP

    ·         latest PBGC filing

    ·         asset statements for 10/31/2020 through current date

    ·         List of contributions made to the plan between 11/1/2020 – current date (this should match what is shown on the plan account statements.

    ·         any sponsor election forms signed 10/31/2019 to date (e.g., election to utilize pre-funding)

    ·         \historical compensation data (the current actuary should be able to provide this for years prior to 10/31/20219 (this is needed to develop average compensation).

    ·         ARPA elections, if any

    ·         copy of the latest annual funding notice

    ·         copy of the last distribution form (e.g., the form for the last participant paid out).

    DC Plan

    ·         Most current plan document (the version we need would have been signed between May 1, 2014 and current date).

    ·         Most current SPD

    ·         calculation reports for plan years ending 10/31/2019 & 110/31/2020.  The report should detail the contributions made for each person under the plan.

    ·         asset statements for 10/31/2020 through current date (if participants direct their own investment, we would need a copy of each participant’s account statements)

     


    Excluding 1099 Employees

    metsfan026
    By metsfan026,

    We have a new potential client that may pay most of it's employees through 1099.  I assume if the bulk (let's say 75% are paid that way), we're going to create discrimination issues?  They were pushing back against me saying someone else told them it wasn't an issue, so I just wanted to confirm


    Top Hat DFVCP submission

    DCPensionGal
    By DCPensionGal,

    Top hat plan never filed statement with DOL so we are taking it through DFVCP.  Do we simply file the top hat statement and pay the $750, or must we also complete and file the several page application (which application does NOT indicate this as one of the items for which this is to be filed, see below): 

    Transactions Corrected Check which transactions listed in the VFCP you have corrected:

    Delinquent Participant Contributions and Participant Loan Repayments to Pension Plans

    Delinquent Participant Contributions to Insured Welfare Plans

    Delinquent Participant Contributions to Welfare Plan Trusts

    Loan at Fair Market Interest Rate to a Party in Interest

    Loan at Below-Market Interest Rate to a Party in Interest

    Loan at Below-Market Interest Rate to a Non-Party in Interest

    Loan at Below-Market Interest Rate Due to Delay in Perfecting Plan’s Security Interest

    Loans Failing to Comply with Plan Provisions for Amount, Duration or Level Amortization

    Default Loans

    Purchase of an Asset by a Plan from a Party in Interest

    Sale of an Asset by a Plan to a Party in Interest

    Sale and Leaseback of Real Property to Employer

    Purchase of Asset by a Plan from a Non-Party in Interest at More Than Fair Market Value

    Sale of an Asset by a Plan to a Non-Party in Interest at Less Than Fair Market Value

    Holding of an Illiquid Asset Previously Purchased by a Plan

    Payment of Benefits Without Properly Valuing Plan Assets on Which Payment is Based

    Duplicative, Excessive, or Unnecessary Compensation Paid by a Plan

    Expenses Improperly Paid by a Plan

    Payment of Dual Compensation to a Plan Fiduciary

     

    Correction Amount


    Which plan document does Ascensus use?

    Peter Gulia
    By Peter Gulia,

    Does anyone know which plan-documents supplier—Relius, ASC, ftwilliam, someone else—Ascensus/FuturePlan licenses from?

     


    Application of Last Day of Employment Rule for Self-Employed Partner in Profit Sharing Plan

    401 Chaos
    By 401 Chaos,

    Welcome any thoughts or experience on this.  Still waiting to see exactly what the specific plan document provisions say here but situation involves a partner in a partnership who leaves the partnership mid-year.  Partner continues to be entitled to a portion of revenues collected during the second half of the year, is assisting generally with collecting receivables and other transition issues, reflected as a partner in the partnership for the year, etc. but is not performing new services / generating new fees for the second half of the year.  Can the partner be considered "employed" on the last day of the plan year for purposes of profit sharing?


    Controlled Group Question

    metsfan026
    By metsfan026,

    I have a quick question and just want to make sure I'm not overlooking anything:

    Company 1
    Person 1 - 100% ownership
    Person 2 - 0% ownership (though they work for the company)

    Company 2
    Person 1 - 75% ownership
    Person 2 - 25% ownership

    The two people are not related.  Since Person 1 owns less than 80% of company 2, there isn't a Controlled Group issue (even though Person 2 works for both, they only have ownership in one).

    Thanks in advance!


    NY Mandated Retirement Plan

    metsfan026
    By metsfan026,

    Is anyone familiar with the mandated retirement plan being instituted in New York?  The question is if a company has an existing Profit Sharing Plan, but doesn't allow for 401(k) contributions, are they exempt from participating in the mandated plan?


    Excluded compensation in Safe Harbor plan

    Penflyer
    By Penflyer,

    Reviewing takeover plan docs from prior TPA.  Document is 3  % safe harbor with cross test language.  Definition of comp excludes bonuses.  Plan passes comp discrimination test but Safe harbor was calculated on comp less bonus.  I thought you had to use a 414s definition of comp for Safe Harbor.  Am I wrong?


    Client property or TPA property

    thepensionmaven
    By thepensionmaven,

    I have released a client from my servicing contract and he is asking me to return my files.

    I know this has come up before, my files consist of paperwork the client has submitted to me (W-2s, K-1, etc),  my calculations, my copies of the investment reports I access online.

    Aside from the client having all this information already, is there any basis for me to send him my file or is this just "sour grapes"?

     


    PY Begins 12/1--what do I prorate?

    BG5150
    By BG5150,

    For some reason, powers that be made this plan effective 12/1/21.

    What limits am I prorating when doing the profit sharing?

    And am I correct in remembering that self-employment income is "earned" on 12/31?  So in this case, the owner will be using his full $290,000 comp?  (unless the comp limit is 1/12 of course...)


    Force-Out of Small Balances

    Catch22PGM
    By Catch22PGM,

    A 401(k) plan has many participants making very small contributions - $4-$5 a week in some cases.  The plan sponsor records participant termination dates with the recordkeeper after each pay period.  The recordkeeper has taken it upon themselves to forfeit small balances for former employees after the plan sponsor enters their termination date.  They are forfeiting employee pre-tax and Roth salary deferrals without any direction from the plan trustees and with no apparent reason other than it's their "policy" not to cut a check for less than $25.  In one instance they forfeited $80 of an employee's pre-tax salary deferrals - about $20 at a time because the plan sponsor made 3 $20 deposits after the employee's termination date was entered.  All of the others we have found were $10 or under.

    Has anyone out here come across this practice and is there anything I'm missing that would allow it?  The plan document certainly doesn't say a small balance can be forfeited vesting be damned.  I'd feel better about it if some of the experts on BenefitsLink have experience with similar approaches by recordkeepers and/or have had the IRS or DOL approve the practice.


    merger of off calendar year safe harbor into calendar year safe harbor and transition period

    30Rock
    By 30Rock,

    My question involves the merger during the 410(b)(6) transition period of 2 401k safe harbor plans with the same safe harbor match but Plan A has a plan year ending 9/30 and Plan B is a 12/31 calendar year end plan. The goal is to consolidate into Plan B by 1/1/2023 since the coverage transition period ends 12/31/22. What is the best way to accomplish this? Options I see are 1. freeze plan A 9/30 and adopt Plan B on 10/1 (transition period ends but does it matter?) so participants will be in Plan B with mirror safe harbor match, and then 12/31/22 merger Plan B into Plan A, or 2. change the plan year of Plan B to a short plan year from 10/1-12/31 and maintain safe harbor status, and then since both Plan A and Plan B will be calendar year plans they can merge on 12/31/2022. This option creates 2 5500's as well,  a plan amendment and also the need for new safe harbor notices for the 10/1 short plan year, so it appears more burdensome. I do not think create a short plan year violates the transition period rule? I appreciate any comments, thoughts, help since I have not really had this issue post-transaction. Thank you!


    Physician with ownership in Dialysis Center

    Dougsbpc
    By Dougsbpc,

    I know many of you must have run into this.

    You have a physician client who's practice sponsors a qualified plan. One problem though. The physician has a 10% interest in a Dialysis Center. Oh yes, and he is a Kidney specialist. ASG? Certainly seems like one. They would not want to consider an additional 15 employees for their plan. However, there is doubt (in this case) that his office together with the Dialysis Center provides services for the public. Even though he refers some of his patients there, he also refers some to the other center in town of which he has no ownership interest.

    Has anyone run into this type of sticky situation? 

    Thanks.


    Multi-employer QDROs and Butch Lewis Act

    JM
    By JM,

    I'm curious to know if anyone has any language for use in a multi-employer plan QDRO that addresses how the AP's share will be affected in the event that the participant receives either a lump sum or installment payments as a result of the Plan's qualifying for funds under the recent Butch Lewis Act?

    Thanks in advance! 


    Loan Corrections

    austin3515
    By austin3515,

    If a participant terminated let's say in July 2021 and made no further payments on the loan, but the loan was not reported on a 2021 1099-R, can the EMployer report under a 2022 1099-R under EPCRS?  I think yes.  The program indicates that this is an option in the event of a "deemed distribution under 72(p)."  Even though this is a loan offset when I look at 72(p) it seems sufficiently broad to conclude that what I describe is a deemed distribution under 72(p).  The terminology of course gives me pause so I'm not 100% confident in my  answer...  EPCRS Section 6.07 is the site.


Portal by DevFuse · Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use