Hokielady
Inactive-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
216 profile views
-
Doesn't require a short plan year of 03/01/2016 -12/31/2016 which means pro rating limits. Would prefer the plan year be 01/01/2016-12/31/2016
-
If the Employer began in March of 2016 1- can their new plan have an effective date of 01/01/2016 for a calendar year? 2-does it matter what type of entity they are- ie corporation; sole prop etc I know IRS said at 1997 ASPPA it's ok- but I am getting push back from my company's doc dept
-
ADP SHM and Additional Fixed Match Based on Year of Service
Hokielady replied to Hokielady's topic in 401(k) Plans
There is no last day requirement or hours requirement- if someone defers they get the match With they way the formula is written - technically if an HCE and NHCE had the same years of service their match would be the same. -
ADP SHM and Additional Fixed Match Based on Year of Service
Hokielady posted a topic in 401(k) Plans
ADP Safe Harbor Enhanced Match- $1 for $1 up to 6% of pay Fixed Match-Based on Year of Service- $1 for $1 up to- Years 1 and 2= 1% of pay Year 3=2% of pay Year 4=3% of pay Year 5 and higher =4% of pay Will the Fixed Match fit into ACP safe harbor? Since all employees have the ability to grow into years of service will this meet the nondiscrimination test IRC 401(m)(11)(B)(iii)? -
Coverage Testing on Controlled Group
Hokielady replied to Hokielady's topic in Retirement Plans in General
Looks to me like a form 5310-A would need to be filed prior to the testing year. I am working with our pension software folks to get the files coded correctly so I can check ABT -
Coverage Testing on Controlled Group
Hokielady replied to Hokielady's topic in Retirement Plans in General
Company B was recently purchased and while the transition period gives them passage no matter what until the plan year that begins 07/01/2016 the client wants to get out ahead of this to determine is there will be a problem in the future. I know it's such a novel concept- the client wants to get ahead of a potential problem! Another question- if we have to aggregate plans then the ACP test will be computed with all eligible employees of Plan A and B- I am concerned that may result in a huge failure- ADP is ok since plan A is very large. What do you think? Also- I am wondering if the SLOB rules may help- since Company A is mainly manufacturing and Company B is software tech company -
Coverage Testing on Controlled Group
Hokielady replied to Hokielady's topic in Retirement Plans in General
The Profit Sharing in Plan has a last day rule to receive a contribution, the 60 were eligible but terminated during the year and worked more than 501 hours; so I believe they will be counted. Profit Sharing- if test plans separately Plan A- NHCE 587/766=76.63% HCE- 23/53= 43.39% Ratio percentage= 176.58% Plan B- NHCE 119/766=15.53% HCE 30/53=56.60% Ratio percentage= 27.45% fail 766(NHCE)/819(Total ees)= 93.53% and Safe Harbor % is 25.25 so if I can pass the second part of AVB I am good. Combined Testing result is the same as Plan A The match has the same eligibility requirement- 12 months so testing should be like the PS above. -
Coverage Testing on Controlled Group
Hokielady replied to Hokielady's topic in Retirement Plans in General
Plan A Coverage Group-total 670 NHCE -647 HCE -23 No match in this plan; but Profit Sharing and 401k- eligibility is 12 months on both sources Benefiting Group for PS and 401k NHCE-587 HCE-23 Plan B Coverage Group-total 149 NHCE-119 HCE-30 No profit Sharing but Match all ees in this plan are eligible for match and deferral; immediate SD entry and 1 year wait on Match I didn't run ABT yet since I am having trouble getting software to recognize both groups. BTW-I also thought you didn't combine the non similar money types, but software provider told me I had to aggregate both in testing- they said Plan B ees would be treated as non benefitting. -
I have two Employers part of a controlled group; both have 06/30 year end Plan A- 401k and Profit Sharing Money source Plan B-401k and discretionary Matching 401k Coverage Plan A can pass 401k coverage on its own (176%) Plan B fails 401k coverage on its own (27.44%) therefore it must be permissively aggregated with Plan A in order to pass- and it does 401m Coverage Fails when calculated separately by each plan and on a combined basis since Plan A has no Match. Profit Sharing Coverage Plan A can pass on its own Plan B fails on its own since there is no Profit Sharing Combined testing passes. So does this mean Plan A has to have a match and fund it?
-
I have a client who has a DB plan and put in a SEP for 2011- I am trying to figure out if the excise tax applies under 4972 (c ) (7). Other facts- it is a one man plan and his pay has always exceed the dollar limit The Deduction limit for SEP and DB is the greater of 1-25% of pay- capped at the dollar limit for the year or 2-the minimum funding requirement for the DB Plan 3-When computing this calculation there is a 6% of pay “freebie” given to the SEP that is permitted before the maximum deductible calculation is performed under steps 1 and 2 So if $49,000 SEP deposit was made in 2012: 1-The deduction for the 2011 contributions would be: a-DB $250,000-contribution determined by actuary b-SEP- $14,700- this is the 6% freebie (245,000 times 6%) the deductible is met since the DB contribution is greater than 25% of $245,000 and there is no SEP beyond the “freebie” 2-The deduction for the 2012 contribution would be: a-DB- minimum $50,317 calculated by actuary b-SEP-$27,183; total which is made up of $15,000 freebie (6% of $250,000 dollar limit) plus SEP Balance $12,183 (25% of $250,000 minus the DB contribution of $50,317) The total SEP deposit in 2012 is $49,000 of which $14,700 is attributable to 2011 and $27,183 is attributable to 2012; therefore $7,117 is a nondeductible contribution The $7,117 can be carried forward and used and deducted in 2013 to help fund the 6% freebie. If participant's total compensation is at least $255,000 the freebie would be $15,300 Question: 1-Can we apply 4972 ©(7) and say there is no nondeductible contribution and therefore there would be no excise tax?
