Liz Hallam
Registered-
Posts
13 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Austin - don't be ashamed think it was Kelsey Mayo (ARA) who mentioned in an article.
-
Look on page 63 of final regs - real clear - good faith until 1/1/2027. Specifical says administrative transition period IS NOT EXTENDED.
-
What is the latest required restatement?
Liz Hallam replied to Tom's topic in 403(b) Plans, Accounts or Annuities
@Paul I - the dates I put in there were based on conversations with IRS folks - nothing in writing. Obviously the date will be based on when most of the mass submitter have received the e-mail telling them they are OK. -
What is the latest required restatement?
Liz Hallam replied to Tom's topic in 403(b) Plans, Accounts or Annuities
Tom - the 2017 date is correct. That first time of IRS approval on 403(b) documents. Cycle 2 plan documents are undergoing IRS review currently. IRS has indicated that all documents should have the approvals by 11/30/24 with anticipated restatement start period to commence 1/1/25. The Cycle 2 period will be two years (don't look for extension). If your client is using a TIAA document, that is the latest letter. -
Municipal/Governmental DB Plans
Liz Hallam replied to truphao's topic in Defined Benefit Plans, Including Cash Balance
ASC offers pre-approved governmental defined benefit. Contact them directly. You may want to also reach out to the other mass submitters (e.g. Relius, FT William, Datair, Ascensus -
OP should reach out to Equitable (product area). This document has been updated as required since 1986 (which may have been the TEFRA, DEFRA REA version depending upon the time). Blank copies are available to those clients who "misplaced" their original copies.
-
"PS-58" costs are imputed income - not cash income - there's nothing to distribute. It's a reporting amount dependent on how participant takes insurance contract. At death, no "basis" rather amount "ar risk" (pure death benefit) is received by beneficiary income-tax free.
-
rocknrolls2 was correct - the trust requirement was added after Orange County, CA (not just the City of Long Branch) filed for bankruptcy. All kinds of stories how judges' accounts were attached because in bank accounts (with high interest rates). Interesting because City of Bridgeport, CT declared bankruptcy before that and no Congressional action. Custodial accounts and annuities satisfy requirements of 457(g). It was not providers who required it was Congress.
-
Bill - that's for mass submitters. This goes back to old submissions (individual letters). You notice I said anticipates for Cycle 3 - depends on status for mass submitters (some are still in negotiations. That's OK because we'll have lots of interim amendments with our restatements.
-
IRS anticipates window opening on 8/1/20 and will close 2 years later (7/31/22). Just a few months late.
