GoVolsKickSomeAss

so i guess its: EA-1 will be 'easier' than MLC, but I'll also need to refresh my 13-yr old FM stuff (minus the derivatives stuff) MCL will be 'harder' than EA-1, but at least I wont need to deal with any FM stuff at all. i think if the old study guides (pretty sure i had ASM) for MLC will be sufficient for EA-1, I'm inclined to try and use my old MLC materials to sit for EA-1, just fill in any gaps with available EA-1 practice tests.

Howdy all, long time lurker first time poster I took a few exams before the kids were born (P & FM), last sitting was 2007 when my daughter was still in the crib. Now looking to get back in the game, definitely just going for the EA and not the ASA path... BUT -- with FM already under my belt, would just sitting for MLC be 'easier' than rehashing the old annuity stuff on EA-1? I sat for MLC (don't even ask the score...exams are damn near impossible with kids that can crawl), so have the materials for both FM & MLC, including the separate flash cards and practice tests. Would that be sufficient for EA-1 study materials and practice tests? The FM stuff is 13 years old, but I didn't really have a problem with that exam -- that being said, I'm not tryna 'over-study' if i cant have to. Mainly I'm just wondering about the MLC vs MLC-part-of-EA1 comparison here. I assume there's some free & good EA-1 practice tests out there? (Gandalf's stuff on Actuarial Outpost for FM was really what allowed me to ace that one). any/all insight would be much appreciated. Thanks