-
Posts
4,717 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
146
BG5150 last won the day on May 27 2023
BG5150 had the most liked content!
Recent Profile Visitors
5,392 profile views
-
Sorry, just realized the OP was way misleading. Edited. This all has to do with, and only with, the 5558. No 5500 or 8955....
-
Wrong on the 5558.
-
I've been at a few that did. years ago, I was an "Sr Plan Administrator" Our rates were: Admin $75 Plan Admin $175 Sr Plan Admin $190 (dang I wish I was getting paid $190/hr) Manager $225 Actuary $300 We normally wouldn't bill for something like responding to a 5558 letter, unless it ran into several hours of work we were not anticipating.
-
Plan assets transferred from Carrier A to Carrier B in 2023. Auditor is looking for reportable transactions (those over 5% of assets). I've never completed that for any transfer between carriers before. Have you? I've had several other plans change carriers mid-2023 and none of them were asking for this. The exception is an individual account where the participant directs the transaction, but the participants in these cases don't direct these transfers. Do I have to attach a schedule per 4j on the Schedule H?
-
Plan name is different than employer name. But we filed the 5558 with the ERs name as both the ER and plan names. For example: Employer: Connecticut Fencing Company Plan name: Fences 'R' Us 401(k) Plan 5558 filed with plan name: Connecticut Fencing Company 401(k) Plan EIN and PN are correct. Will we have a problem? Software is giving me a warning.
-
Thanks!
-
Do I have to file a 5500-SF for a plan that was effective 1/1/23 but not adopted until May 2024?
-
But the match rate changes mid year.
-
403(b) plan has a Discretionary Match, allocated per payroll, no true-up. Match formula is dollar for dollar up to 5% of pay. Participant makes $700,000 per annum. 2024 Comp limit is $345,000. Should they stop the match when it gets to $17,250? (5% of $345k) Or stop when their compensation hits $345k? Or continue the match and we will use $345,000 as comp in the ACP test only? And there is a wrinkle: They changed the match starting August 1 to be only up to 2% What would the annual max be then? Would it be 3.75%? Or $12,075? That’s (7/12)*.05 + (5/12)*.02 : 7 months of 5% and 5 months of 2% averaged. I know it’s a lot here. Just trying to point them in the right direction if/when to stop. Keep in mind these are payroll matches, not annual.
-
If we amend a plan to allow for Federal disaster relief distributions, is that semi-permanent? Can they remove that provision without a cutback of benefits? Like age 59 1/2 withdrawals?
-
For the “evicted from principal residence” category, would an uninhabitable house qualify? I have a participant whose septic system needs repairs. Without a septic system, the house will be considered uninhabitable and they will have to move out (albeit temporarily).
-
Not stopping Match/SH when comp goes over limit
BG5150 posted a topic in Retirement Plans in General
Is there specific guidance anywhere that says Employers should not stop payroll matches when the employee reaches the max compensation during the year? For example, plan matches dollar for dollar. I don't see why the Employer should stop (testing reasons notwithstanding). Or, maybe someone started deferring in March with a 50% of deferrals no more than 6% of comp (for a cap of $10,350 on $345,000 in comp). They hit $345k in September, but hasn't hit that match cap yet. We know they are supoosed to keep going until they hit a cap, but is there anywhere that says it outright? -
When these self-certification plans get audited by the IRS in a few years, will they be looking for proof? Who gets in trouble if someone self-certifies a hardship that has nothing to do with one the safe harbor rules? (I need a new car. Not safe harbor reason. But, participant my reason it thusly: I need a new car to get to my job. Without my job, I can't pay my rent and I'll get kicked out.) Will there be a steep penalty tax on the participant if they mis-interpret the rules and they get caught? How does it affect the plan? How so, then?