We're looking at a potential takeover in which HCEs have been allowed to defer but none of the eligible NHCEs were offered the opportunity to defer. As a result, the NHCE's ADP is 0%
Appendix A Section .05(2) of Rev Proc 2013-12 calls for a contribution equal to the "missed deferral opportunity"; defined as 50% of the actual deferral percentage.
The employer can argue that the ADP is 0%, and therefore 50% of 0% is 0. However, in this case, the employer created the 0% ADP. It seems he should not be allowed to benefit from the wholesale exclusion
What is a reliable correction under these facts? Should we assume there is a minimum 3% ADP?
Your feedback is much appreciated.