Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rev. Proc. 2001-17 seems to require that a plan have, at the least, an opinion/notification/determination letter that considered TRA '86 in order to correct. What about situation where last letter did not consider TRA '86??? The opinion letter employer has with respect to prototype clearly says it is not considering TRA '86.

Posted

After a little closer reading, it seems that the plan would be able to correct under the general procedures of VCP. As a result, a higher fee will apply.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use