chris Posted May 14, 2001 Posted May 14, 2001 Rev. Proc. 2001-17 seems to require that a plan have, at the least, an opinion/notification/determination letter that considered TRA '86 in order to correct. What about situation where last letter did not consider TRA '86??? The opinion letter employer has with respect to prototype clearly says it is not considering TRA '86.
chris Posted May 15, 2001 Author Posted May 15, 2001 After a little closer reading, it seems that the plan would be able to correct under the general procedures of VCP. As a result, a higher fee will apply.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now