Guest Doug Johnston Posted June 27, 2001 Share Posted June 27, 2001 Our client would like to "fund" its nonqualified deferred compensation plan by issuing notes to the participants. The notes would be secured by company assets and would entitle the participant to annual interest payments, but the principal would be contingent upon completion of a specified number of years of service. Obviously, the annual interest payments would be taxable income to the participants, but the principal (although secured) would be subject to forfeiture. I realize there are other ways to secure deferred compensation, but this is the method the owner dreamed up. Are there any holes in it? Also, the company is part of a controlled group. The owner would like to count the "select group" of key employees based on the whole group, but actually offer it disproportionately to key employees employed by the parent company. Is there any guidance on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Maldonado Posted June 27, 2001 Share Posted June 27, 2001 Have you thought about the possible federal and state securities laws implications of issuing those notes? Kirk Maldonado Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wmacdonald Posted June 28, 2001 Share Posted June 28, 2001 To me, this is a complex approach to something that could be a lot easier, like a letter of credit etc. Why do you want to go this untested complex way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everett Moreland Posted June 28, 2001 Share Posted June 28, 2001 Income will result immediately if the notes are transferable. I did something like this 15 years ago with notes and was concerned about some old cases dealing with notes. I would not use notes unless you are comfortable that they will not cause immediate taxation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Maldonado Posted June 29, 2001 Share Posted June 29, 2001 Everett Moreland: Were those court decisions based on the economic benefit doctrine, or did the court employ some other line of reasoning? Kirk Maldonado Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everett Moreland Posted June 29, 2001 Share Posted June 29, 2001 Sorry, but after 15 years I have only a vague memory that I was concerned about the cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now