Gary Posted November 15, 2001 Posted November 15, 2001 A plan requires that the act equiv mortality table be the 1971 GAM for males projected to 1978 using scale E. I applied the scale incorporated in my spreadsheet program and it resulted in a small change in the q's, relatively, and a small change in for eg. the age 65 annuity. I don't recall exactly, but I believe the impact on the age 65 annuity was maybe 1% or so. My questions are: 1. Does it make sense that the impact would be this small? 2. Does anyone have a copy of the scale E and know where it originated? Perhaps it wasn't applied correctly. My feeling is that applying a mortality projection scale requires the factor (less than one) to be multiplied by the nth power, where n is the number of years projected out. i.e. in my case it would be 7 (1971 to 1978). Finally this factor is applied to the q's resulting in lower q's, thus higher annuity factors. Any comments?
david rigby Posted November 15, 2001 Posted November 15, 2001 Found it. TRANSACTIONS OF SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES 1971 VOL. 23 PT. 1 NO. 67 Discussion of new scales D and E begins on the sixth page of this article: http://www.soa.org:80/library/tsa/1970-79/...V23PT1N6724.pdf I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
FAPInJax Posted November 16, 2001 Posted November 16, 2001 Your understanding is correct from what I remember as well. It may just be the projection scale and the limited projection period did not make enough difference.
david rigby Posted November 16, 2001 Posted November 16, 2001 More help from the Society of Actuaries website. Go to this link http://www.soa.org/tablemgr/tablemgr.asp , read the qxtables.txt file, and scroll down to see that many different projection scales are available. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now