Jump to content

E.T.A. for "Technical Correction" of 457 limit?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone heard when Congress may tackle the “technical corrections” that will make 457(B) deferral limits 100% of earnings instead of a 50% effective percentage (because, unlike the 401(k) and 403(B) 100% limits, the 457 limit is 100% of taxable earnings)?

Posted

Hmm, are we supposed to be able to predict what Congress is going to do? ;) The experience so far is that they will act sometime between 3 months and 5 years--or never. Certainly, the IRS is going forward with regulations on the assumption that any technical correction is not imminent.

Employee benefits legal resource site

The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances.

Posted

> Certainly, the IRS is going forward with regulations on the assumption that

> any technical correction is not imminent.

Right, on December 7, IRS Office of Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel Senior Attorney Cheryl Press, regarding the three different definitions of includible compensation applicable to Section 401(k), 403(B), and 457 plans, said "it is not for [iRS] to second guess what Congress wanted to do."

Press also emphasized that the regulations are subject to change before being issued.

Posted

I can vouch for that--she and I were on the same panel. :)

Employee benefits legal resource site

The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances.

Guest David G
Posted

To Carol or anyone else who attended the governmental conference in D.C. on Dec. 7-8. Were there any other interesting comments from the IRS or Treasury with regard to interpretation of the new tax law and when additional guidance will be coming out.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Employee benefits legal resource site

The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use