Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is the IRS still pondering the question of allowing elimination of optional forms of benefit under DB Plans? I remember reading something, somewhere, that they may revisit this issue or maybe even propose some regs in 2003. Has anyone heard this as well?

Posted

This was a change under EGTRRA. The only situation is when there is a deminimus result of deleting the option. This is supposed to be directed at mergers where they two plans had similar, but not exactly the same options. This requires the IRS to provide regulations to interpret correctly.

Posted

as far as i know, i still gotta believe that 411(d)(6) is always an issue to reckon with as a result of an elimination of an optional form of benefit. but there may be some leniency w/r/t certain optional forms, which i do not know offhand at this time.

gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use