Jump to content

Substantial Risk of Forfeiture


Recommended Posts

Posted

Would a requirement that an employee not go to work for the employer's client constitute a substantial risk of forfeiture, for purposes of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan?

This is not technically a non-compete requirement as discussed in section 1.83-3(B)(2) of the regs.

------------------

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest bswift
Posted

christine, what's the purpose of the restriction? Although it may not be just like a noncompete, its purpose may be the same. my recollection is that there are a couple of plrs out there that dicuss the noncompete issue. good luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use