richard Posted March 16, 1999 Posted March 16, 1999 It is typical in an S Corporation and now in LLCs for the owner to take a W2 salary from the corporation, "leave some money" in the corporation at the end of the year, and this amount is included on his 1040 as a corporate distribution or dividend (I'm not sure of the exact term). Does this "corporate distribution or dividend" count for various definitions of compensation which affect retirement plans. For example: Assume the owner's W2 is $25,000 and his "dividend" is $20,000. (Use higher numbers if you would like.) 1. For the 415 limit on DC and DC plans, do we use a pay of $25,000 or $45,000? 2. For the compensaton used in the denominator of the 401(a)(4) tests, do we use $25,000 or $45,000? 3. For the compensation used in the denominator of the ADP/ACP test in a 401(k) plan, do we use $25,000 (plus his deferral)or $45,000 (plus his deferral)? 4. For testing in a 401(k) plan against the 25% of pay limit, do we use $25,000 (plus his deferral) or $45,000 (plus his deferral)? 5. For determining the 15% of compensation company-wide profit sharing contribution limit, do we use $25,000 or $45,000? If we define "compensation" in the plan to include this "corporate distribution or dividend", does this help? Does it make a difference whether the company is an S Corporation or an LLC?
Ervin Barham Posted March 16, 1999 Posted March 16, 1999 I had this question come up several years ago. For purposes of retirement calculation (all of them), you would only use the W-2 income. Since most plans (at least the ones I'm familiar with) define comp as "earned income", the dividend would not count since that is not considered earned income. I can't really answer your question on amending the comp definition, but somehow I don't think that is possible. I don't have a cite. And no, it doesn't matter if this is an LLC or partnership. Both are treated for plan purposes as a partnership.
Guest Dan Ashley Posted March 17, 1999 Posted March 17, 1999 Richard, Ervin is right. This is a major trap for the unwary.
Guest Mike Kimball Posted March 18, 1999 Posted March 18, 1999 I agree with the above. When testing several 401(k) plans for 1998 (their first year),I had a few s-corps that were thinking they could defer a substantial amount and still only draw a W-2 of 40-50,000. Boy did they get a surprise when the ADP failed! [bTW these are clients brought to us for admin after being sold by someone else in various parts of the country. We never had opportunity to advise them properly!].
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now