mwyatt Posted August 26, 2002 Posted August 26, 2002 Was looking for a fairly ancient mortality table over the weekend on a takeover case and remembered to check the SOA website. The new version of Table Manager contains hundreds of mortality tables (you can select the country of choice so you're not wading through foreign tables) and also has an Excel add-in. Here's the link: http://www.soa.org/tablemgr/tablemgr.asp No connection to the author, but highly recommend this to all. Hope this is of help.
wmyer Posted August 31, 2004 Posted August 31, 2004 This link no longer works. I am looking for the GAR 94 annuity factors (age 65, 50% male/50% female). Can't seem to find it on the SOA website. Does someone have this in EXCEL that they could e-mail? Pax? W Myer
WDIK Posted August 31, 2004 Posted August 31, 2004 Table Manager I think that this is the updated link. ...but then again, What Do I Know?
wmyer Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Thanks for the link, WDIK. It will be very helpful, except...it doesn't have 1994-GAR. So, I'm still trying to get an immediate annuity factor table and a deferred annuity factor table for that. Anyone? W Myer
david rigby Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Try this GAR94_proj_to_2000_Unisex.txt I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
MGB Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 Note that what Pax posted is NOT the same as what the original question asked. But then, I suspect that the original question was asking for something different than what he really wanted. It sounds like what he wanted is what Pax posted. That is a mortality table from the IRS. It is NOT the GAR 94...it is DERIVED from it (removal of loads, projection to a date in the future, and blended sex). If you use a 50/50 blend of GAR 94 (as the original question asked), it would produce different results.
david rigby Posted September 1, 2004 Posted September 1, 2004 MGB’s comments are correct. The table I posted above is from IRS Revenue Ruling 2001-62, and is derived from a 1994 table. I assumed that was the nature of wmyer's request, but perhaps that is incorrect. See the 1995 edition of the Transactions of the Society of Actuaries for these articles: http://library.soa.org/library/tsa/1990-95/TSA95V4721.pdf http://library.soa.org/library/tsa/1990-95/TSA95V4720.pdf http://library.soa.org/library/tsa/1990-95/TSA95V4722.pdf I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now