Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is anyone aware of a reason why a plan sponsor may not eliminate a social security supplement (that is not a QSUPP) even for employees who need only to resign in order to receive the supplement and for participants already in pay status?

Please ignore HR and labor law issues.

Thank you.

PS: I am not referring to an "early retirement benefit" or a "retirement-type subsidy".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use