Jump to content

Health Benefits Under A Top Hat Plan - 105(h) Issue, or Not?

Recommended Posts

Presume a top hat nonqualified deferred compensation plan that contains language entitling a participant to receive group or individual health insurance at the Company’s expense for the remainder of the participant’s life following retirement or disability, and extends this benefit to the participant’s surviving spouse for her lifetime if the participant dies after becoming eligible for full retirement.

Does this present a discrimination problem under IRC Sec. 105(h)?

And does it trigger the FASB standards applicable to retiree medical expenses?

Any comments appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re 105(h). Could be an issue depending upon deal. For executive retiree medical benefits, I think generally that the payment of premium to a fully insured medical plan to provide medical benefit coverage and medical benefits for an executive retiree would not raise any 105(h) issues, while the payment of medical benefits to an executive retiree on a self-insured plan would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RTK, thanks for the response, but I am not sure I understand the distinction you draw.

Sec. 105(h) refers to reimbursement of medical expenses, and medical expenses do not include premiums for any type of health/medical insurance.

Are you viewing provision of self-insured care as expense reimbursement?

Please excuse my dense-ness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I view 105(h) this way.

If medical benefits are paid under a self-insured medical reimbursement plan, a 105(h) issue exists. If a discriminatory plan, generally the medical benefits are included in the highly compensated income. I do not believe that the mere provision of the self insured medical benefit coverage is taxable under 105(h), only the actual medical benefits paid. Thus, if the executive receives health insurance under a discriminatory self-insured plan, the executive would be taxed on any medical benefits paid, but should not be taxed on the coverage.

This is in contrast to providing medical benefits under a fully insured plan to executives. There 105(h) would not be an issue, and the cost of coverage and the medical benefits paid would be excluded from the executive's income.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...