Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This client is a non-profit entity funded by private donations and government grants,so money is always tight. They would like to freeze benefits in order to minimize funding requirements. They are also concerned with needing an audit once they cross the 100 participant threshold. The DREC will be a concern too.

Can the plan be amended to freeze both benefits and participation?

Posted

That is the usual meaning of "freeze".

I suggest a freeze amendment be explicit about freezing benefits, service, and participation. Also, look to see if there are ancillary benefits that you might want to eliminate or "tighten"; for example, a disability benefit is not 411(d)(6) protected.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use