Archimage Posted November 20, 2002 Posted November 20, 2002 It is my feeling that rate banding should almost never be used with small plans but rather with plans with a minimum of around 20 HCEs and minimum of around 100 employees. I can't find much support for this so I am turning to you for some guidance and/or feedback.
Tom Poje Posted November 20, 2002 Posted November 20, 2002 this issue is getting much out of hand the regs allow you to do a rate band all that being said you could end up dead if the bands are too much, do you understand yes the regs allow you to rate band, but only as long as "the accrual rates within the range are not significantly higher for the HCEs than the NHCEs" I asked about that years ago. What gives, the regs say I can use a 5% band, then they turn around and say I can't. This was the example I was given. NHCE 5.25 HCE 5.00 NHCE 4.75 This is ok to rate band, with a midpoint of 5% because you are bringing one nhce up and one nhce down HCE 5.25 NHCE 5.00 NHCE 4.74 this would not be ok to band with 5% midpoint because you are bringing one NHCE up and bringing one HCE down. Clearly a case where the HCE is significantly higher. OK, so I live with that example. seems reasonable interpretation of the regs to me.
Archimage Posted November 20, 2002 Author Posted November 20, 2002 I don't remember the IRS ever writing their code in the form of limericks...
Tom Poje Posted November 21, 2002 Posted November 21, 2002 really? My copy says "Alice in Wonderland through the Looking Glass of Pensions" you mean I shouldn't be relying on that copy?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now