Guest ladycpa Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 I have a client who is terminating a profit sharing plan that has been in existence since 1985. On the Form 5310, they ask for the reason for termination. In this case, the plan sponsor is just tired of dealing with it. Does anyone have any experience with just attaching a statement that the plan has become an "administrative burden"? If so, how did the IRS respond?
jpod Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 For an old plan, it's not an issue. "Administrative burden" is fine.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 I have used "Business Decison" and never been questioned. I like it because it's generic and truthful. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
E as in ERISA Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 If the plan had been a huge success with employees, then the employer would generally not terminate it even if it was an administrative burden. So there probably are other "business reasons" like lack of interest by employees that you could cite in addition to the administrative burden.
Kirk Maldonado Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 I've never heard of the IRS challenging any reason for terminating a plan. I've always been tempted to try "the plan fiduciary was abducted by alien creatures." Kirk Maldonado
mbozek Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 lack of interest or too many govt rules is ok. Plans in existance more than 10 years do not need a reason for terminaton-- I would ignore the question. mjb
jpod Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 NO - Do not ignore the question, but it really does not matter how you answer it.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted December 10, 2002 Posted December 10, 2002 I think I am going to take Kirk's answer and add "purple monkey dishwasher" to it. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
BTH Posted December 11, 2002 Posted December 11, 2002 Recently, we filed a 5310 for a Profit Sharing Plan where we indicated that the business' adverse business conditions didn't allow it to continue to fund or maintain the Plan. The business had been in bad shape for a number of years and no contributions had been made since the mid-90's. The IRS reviewer actually did come back and ask why no contributions had been made to the Plan, even though he acknowledged our adverse business conditions answer. While he may have been reviewing the contribution question on the 5310 and not necessarily the reason for termination, it does show that the IRS does actually look at this stuff sometimes. BTH
Kirk Maldonado Posted December 12, 2002 Posted December 12, 2002 BTH: That is a perfect example of the maxim that "no good deed goes unpunished." Kirk Maldonado
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now