Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A cross-tested DC plan has not been amended for EGTRRA and thus continues to use the old 401(a)(17) limit for allocations, is it still acceptable to use the 200,000 compensation limitation when performing the cross-testing?

I think yes, because the testing definition satisfies 414(s), but I have not seen this question addressed and am looking for some confirmation.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Posted

Unless the document also lays out the cross-testing methodology, and would therefore incorporate the same un-increased 401a17 limit, so confirmed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use