Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

One question that just arose under IRC 404(a)(8)© is whether you would want to proceed with a 412i plan for a sole proprietor which would be partially funded with insurance policies, since under 404 the premiums are not deductible? Am I all wet, or is an underlying condition of 412i that the plan sponsor be incorporated in some fashion?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, answered my own question (I think) in that IRC 404 is explicitly talking about true cost of insurance (ie PS-58) rather than actual premium paid, which is same case regardless. Of course, the current taxation of PS-58 is undersold in the presentations I've seen WRT 412i plans.

Posted

Hopefully this 412(i) mania is about to end. Apparently the IRS is about to start issuing "guidance", which sound more like a warning. It is a "very high priority" according to some comments made at the LA Benefits Conference.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use