mwyatt Posted February 10, 2003 Posted February 10, 2003 One question that just arose under IRC 404(a)(8)© is whether you would want to proceed with a 412i plan for a sole proprietor which would be partially funded with insurance policies, since under 404 the premiums are not deductible? Am I all wet, or is an underlying condition of 412i that the plan sponsor be incorporated in some fashion? -------------------------------------------------------------------- Actually, answered my own question (I think) in that IRC 404 is explicitly talking about true cost of insurance (ie PS-58) rather than actual premium paid, which is same case regardless. Of course, the current taxation of PS-58 is undersold in the presentations I've seen WRT 412i plans.
AndyH Posted February 11, 2003 Posted February 11, 2003 Hopefully this 412(i) mania is about to end. Apparently the IRS is about to start issuing "guidance", which sound more like a warning. It is a "very high priority" according to some comments made at the LA Benefits Conference.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now