Guest MikeH Posted April 1, 2003 Posted April 1, 2003 I need some assistance from the community with the following scenario. We had a DB participant pass on in January 2003 who was receiving a single life annuity. As part of a legacy benefit, this participant had employee contributions that they were receiving a non-taxable portion with each monthly annuity payment. The question is, now that the participant has passed on, what should be done with the remaining balance of their non-taxable base? For example, the participant has a remaining non-tax base balance of $2000 as of 1/31/2003 which they were receiving apportionments of $30 per month over the life of the annuity. Since there is a remaining balance of the non-forfeitable employee contributions, do we cut another check for the remainder of the employee contributions and pay to the beneficiary? Any other alternatives? Thanks, MikeH
Guest kdfox2 Posted April 3, 2003 Posted April 3, 2003 It's been many years since I worked with a contributory Plan - probably around 1998 was my last time; however, this is how I recall handling this type of situation way back then: If the total amount of the annuity paid to the retiree from ASD through date of death is greater than the beginning balance of the non-tax base balance, nothing further is payable to the beneficiary. The reasoning was that an amount equal to the total non-tax base balance amount had been received by the participant at the time of death. For example, suppose the retiree had a non-tax base balance of $3,000 on his ASD and began a single life annuity of $500 with $10 of it as non-tax basis. He received the annuity for 1 year exactly before passing away, making the total amount of benefit paid to him $6,000. Since this amount is greater than the beginning $3,000 non-tax base balance amount, nothing is paid to the beneficiary. Even though he was only actually paid $120 as non-tax basis, he had already received more than $3,000 worth of payments from the Plan. Unfortunately, since it's been so long, I do not recall the code cites that backed up the decision to handle the situation this way. Good luck!
david rigby Posted April 3, 2003 Posted April 3, 2003 There are (at least) two issues: 1. What the plan says about "recovery" of the original employee amount. I think that the summary provided by kdfox2 is the most common. 2. What about the tax-related questions. Using the above example, this is what I recall: The employee contributions are being recovered at the rate of $10 per month. Since the employee received only $120 of the original $3000, then the balance is taken as a tax deduction. IRC section 72 is the relevant cite. Note that the $3000 is assumed to be the employee contributions without interest. Any other, more learned, opinions? (Of course we are back to the irony of filing a tax return, so you can take the deduction, in the year of death.) I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now