Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest MartyH
Posted

Our self funded plan covers an employee and spouse. The spouse has COBRA through her former employer. The spouse's former employer states her claims are covered by them only as secondary since she is on COBRA and her husbands plan would be primary. Is this typical of COBRA, being secondary to other Plans or is this something tha would specially be indicated in their SPD?

Posted

If they are fully insured, it would be something indicated in their master policy.

If they are instead self-insured, it depends on what their PD says assuming that it does not conflict with their SPD.

What does yours say about dependent coverage and situations at conflict?

In any case, are you stating that this spouse has dual coverage? I usually see that COBRA is dropped when other coverage is secured. What happened in this case?

George D. Burns

Cost Reduction Strategies

Burns and Associates, Inc

www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction)

www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)

Posted

COB issues vary from plan to plan, region to region and state to state. As far as I'm aware of, there is nothing in the COBRA regs that deems which plan would be either primary or secondary. Just out of curiosity, why is this person on COBRA and your health plan? I know it's possible that there could be some advantage to this depending on the richness of either plan, however, it is very unlikely. If this person wants to waste a couple hundred bucks a year, I'd be more than happy to forward you my mailing address. :)

Posted

I guess this means that absent language in your self-insured plan, the COBRA plan which covers this spouse directly would be primary, if I read Kirk's cite correctly.

George D. Burns

Cost Reduction Strategies

Burns and Associates, Inc

www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction)

www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)

Guest MartyH
Posted

Thanks for all the help. We have requested a copy of the order of benefit detemination outlined in the spouse's SPD. Our plan (the husband's) states "the plan which covers the person on whose expense a claim is based as a Dependent of an Active Employee shall be determined before the benefits of a plan which covers such person as a former employee or a dependent of a former employee". This makes it a little more confusing as our employee is also a "former employee". Although he is not on COBRA, he is only eligiible through his hour bank with hours he accumulated while working under our collectively bargaining agreement. As of 1/1/03 he transferred to another plan and while he is gaining eligibility with the new plan he has enough hours to run out his hour bank with continuing coverage under our plan.

Just glad to know this was not a "known COBRA fact" and I was the only "unenlighten one" out here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use