Guest jac Posted May 7, 2003 Posted May 7, 2003 I recall reading a reference to a California state case where the court ordered the pension plan to change the form of benefit a participant was receiving after the participant had begun receiving benefits under another form of benefit. I can't find this case, and hoped someone on this board might recall the name. Thanks.
david rigby Posted May 7, 2003 Posted May 7, 2003 When it comes to California courts, one never knows, but perhaps this discussion thread will help: http://www.benefitslink.com/boards/index.p...=ST&f=89&t=2851 I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now