Guest ro32 Posted May 19, 2003 Posted May 19, 2003 Does anyone know whether HIPAA's nondiscrimination provision, or any other law for that matter, prevents a health plan from requiring a participant to provide proof of good health before reinstating the participant's lifetime maximum benefit under the health plan?
GBurns Posted May 20, 2003 Posted May 20, 2003 Is this self funded or fully insured? If you are going to let this participant be reinstated under the plan, do you not think that it would be gross discrimination to change the terms of coverage just for this employee? The person is either going to get the plan that everyone similarly situated, or in the same class, gets. If the coverage is guaranteed issue, how can you change it? What you are adding is essentially a pre-existing condition. If the coverage is fully insured, how and why would you want to try and change the issued policy which was issued by the insurer not by the employer? What is your state law on pre-ex? If the person suffers from something that falls under ADA, why open a big can of worms? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now