david rigby Posted August 8, 2003 Posted August 8, 2003 Anyone have any thoughts on this? http://www.actuarialstandardsboard.org/pdf...and2_repeal.pdf I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
MGB Posted August 8, 2003 Posted August 8, 2003 They have been considering this for a long time. The items repealed were written in an educational format, rather than a standards format. Standards provide guidelines on professional behavior. There are a number of different Actuarial Standards of Practice (all written after the repealed pieces) that apply to services under SFAS 87 and 88. Most of what was in the repealed pieces concerned methodology and algorithms for interpreting the FASB standards. That is no longer necessary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now