Guest pension222 Posted September 19, 2003 Posted September 19, 2003 Reg. 1.401(a)(4)-5(a)(3) is the 5 year safe harbor for grants of benefits for past years of service. If one were to establish a new DB plan and not use this safe harbor (i.e. count all years of service prior to establishing the plan) the determination as to whether or not this has the effect of discriminating significantly in favor of the the HCE's is a facts and circumstances test. Does anyone out there have any examples of successful demonstrations that granting more than the 5 years allowed under the safe harbor was not discriminatory?
david rigby Posted September 19, 2003 Posted September 19, 2003 Seen it. The testing included those who were employed during that service, even if not employed at the plan's effective date. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Guest merlin Posted September 19, 2003 Posted September 19, 2003 How was the test performed? More to the point, how do you test for discrimination with respect to people who are not plan participants and never will be?
david rigby Posted September 22, 2003 Posted September 22, 2003 Census data was collected and testing performed as if the plan had been in existence. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now