Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Have a small DB plan that provides the deminimus benefit. The plan is co-sponsored by two sole proprietors (each participants in the plan and no other employees). One sole proprietor has yet to make a profit. Can we provide him with the deminimus benefit even though he has only had negative earnings so far?

Posted

A related point, a few years back some IRS Audit guidelines essentially stated that the 10k De Minimus benefit was payable only as an annuity, and not as a lump sum, if a participant lacked an actual high-3 compensation avg. of 10k. We've adhered to this IRS position but I'd love to hear if anyone disagrees and feels the De Minimus benefit can be paid as a lump sum even if actual high-3 average wouldn't otherwise support it.

Posted

From Gray Book:

QUESTION 94- 22

Lump Sum Availability of Section 415(b)(4) Amount -- 415

Under section 415( b)(4), a defined benefit plan may pay up to $10,000 per year (regardless of age) if the employee has no defined contribution benefits from the employer. Assuming that such amount exceeds the otherwise determined 415( b) limit, can it be paid in the form of a lump sum?

RESPONSE:

No. IRC Regulation 1.415-3(f)(4) states: "Computation of $10,000 Amount. For purposes of subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph, the value of the retirement benefit payable under the plan is not adjusted upward for early retirement provisions and benefits which are not in the form of a straight life annuity (whether or not directly related to retirement benefits)." In other words, no upward adjustment in the $10,000 is allowed for payment in a form other than straight life annuity, including a lump sum.

Copyright © 1994, Enrolled Actuaries Meeting

All rights reserved by Enrolled Actuaries Meeting. Permission is granted to print or otherwise reproduce a limited number of copies of the material on the diskette for personal, internal, classroom, or other instructional use, on the condition that the foregoing copyright notice is used so as to give reasonable notice of the copyright of the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting. This consent for free limited copying without prior consent of the Enrolled Actuaries Meeting does not extend to making copies for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for inclusion in new collective works, or for sale or resale.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

He may not want to make a contribution if he has no earned income. If the sole proprietor has no net income, he cannot deduct any portion of the contribution due to the 404a8C limit. There is nothing explicit in the Code that allows someone to carry forward the deduction or to establish a tax basis, so what amounts to an after-tax contribution would then be taxed again after distribution from the plan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use