Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

ERISA Section 4045 authorizes the PBGC to recover the portion of lump sum amounts distributed in the 3 year period prior to distress termination that are greater than the life annuity that would have been paid if elected instead of the lump sum.

Does the PBGC frequently use this authorization?

The plan in question is a small plan (13 monthly retirees and 6 vested terms) that has offered lump sums for a long period of time.

The vested term wanting a lump sum is not a decision maker with the plan sponsor (not an hce, owner, key, etc.). The lump sum is not being asked for in anticipation of a distress termination which may or may not occur in the next year.

Any thoughts or experience would be appreciated.

The current thought is to pay the lump sum but caveat it with a cite of ERISA Section 4045 indicated the PBGC ability to recover certain amounts.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

No specific experience with this plan provision. The statute says the PBGC "is authorized", does not say "required". However, since it is a statute and not a regulation, probably wise to assume they will use it. Also, PBGC financial condition right now would indicate they want to go after every dollar they can. Might be some flexibility.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use