Guest rocnrols2 Posted December 30, 2003 Posted December 30, 2003 Y is a subsidiary of X. Both X and Y maintain 401(k) plans. Y's operations were shut down and all of its employees were eventually terminated from employment. The Y 401(k) plan is being terminated. A small number of Y employees have been hired by X. X will not accept plan-to-plan transfers of the Y plan account balances of former Y employees until the IRS issues a favorable determination letter on the plan's termination. Some of these employees requested distributions from the Y plan to rollover to an IRA maintained by mutual fund company M (which also provided the investments for the Y 401(k) plan.) Since the Y employees who became X employees did not have a "severance from employment," they could not take distributions, and thus could not effect rollovers into an IRA. In one case, an employee who initially elected a rollover told M to stop and leave it in Y's plan. However, M proceeded with the rollover. How should this be corrected? (1) Should Y go to affected former employees, tell them that they could not make rollovers and ask them to pay back their balances plus earnings to the Y plan? (2) Should Y go after M for effectuating rollovers they were instructed to stop? Or should some combination of the above be done?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now