betheeg Posted January 28, 2004 Posted January 28, 2004 company currently has 401k with only employee contributions. because audit costs are out of control (around $10,000) does it make sense to go to a 403(b)? can you restate as 403(b) or will 401k have to terminate giving ee's option to roll to 403(b)? any reasons to not do this? thanks for any help....
mbozek Posted January 28, 2004 Posted January 28, 2004 I dont know of any reason for an 501c3 entity to adopt a 401(k) plan instead of a 403(b) annuity because of the additional costs/ reporting, etc which comes from maintaining a qual plan. The only advantage (if this is an advantage) is that employees in a k plan can invest in individual stocks and bonds. All employees can contribute 13k to a 403(b) plan since there is no ADP to limit contributions by HCEs. Best solution is to terminate the k plan establish a 403(b) plan and allow employees to rollover the proceeds to a 403(b) plan. A 403(b) plan is not considered a successor plan under the proposed 401(k) regs. A 401(k) plan can not be restated as a 403(b) plan because a 403(b) plan is not a qualified plan. Termination of k plan should not be difficult if only contributions are salary reduction. There may be a question of how to transfer outstanding loans in the 401(k) plan. By the way, why does it cost 10k do an audit of sal reduction assets in a k plan? mjb
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now