Guest CRC02 Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 Do I have this right? A db plan that permits continued participation after normal retirement date must provide participants with a benefit equal to the greater of: (1) the age/service benefit or (2) the actuarially increased value of the normal retirement benefit when the participant ultimately retires, unless the plan provides participants a suspension of benefits notice at age 65, in which case the plan need only provide the age/service benefit. Also, if a plan opts to provide the notice, does the plan need to contain a statement that such a notice will be issued?
Guest dsyrett Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 I think you have it right, and I believe that the plan would have to contain a provision (including mention of the notice) if you were going to suspend actuarially equivalent increases.
Effen Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 I agree The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
AndyH Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 But, the notice will only result in suspension if the person works over a certain number of hours per month or year, 48 per month or 480 per year if I recall correctly.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now