Guest Willy235 Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 Assume a defined contribution plan that allows loans. If a domestic relations order provides that the plan will loan the alternate payee $200,000, can this be a QDRO? The main issue is, I believe, whether this arrangement violates the requirement of Code section 414(p)(3) that the order not require a "type or form of benefit . . . that is not otherwise permitted by the plan." The plan would permit a loan to the participant, but obviously couldn't do so for more than $50,000. I don't think this works, but am interested in the opinion of others. Thanks.
Belgarath Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 FWIW - I agree - it shouldn't be a valid QDRO. Is the alternate payee by any chance the ex of a Trustee/Plan Administrator? If so, my increasingly suspicious mind might suspect the possibility of a sham divorce...
Guest Willy235 Posted March 1, 2004 Posted March 1, 2004 Thanks for your input. The alternate payee is the ex of a trustee, but there is nothing sham about this divorce, to put it mildly. It would obviously be much easier, not to mention clearly legal, to provide for straightforward payment to the alternate payee. In case you are wondering, the reasons to consider this more convoluted approach involves tax liens against the participant.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now