Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest cphs
Posted

Is it a common plan design to require lump sum distributions below a certain dollar amount (for example, $10,000) and installment distributions above that amount? I'm not aware of any problems with this arrangement, but would appreciate feedback.

Posted

Is the installment distribution a BRF (benefit right or feature) that should be reviewed for 401(a)(4) discrimination?

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest cphs
Posted

That's a good point. It appears that it is. Presumably you could solve that problem by permitting installments for all account balances, but then only permit lump sums below the designated threshold. Any other thoughts on this?

Posted

Take a look at IRS Reg. 1.401(a)(4)-4(b)(2)(ii)(D) - a requirement that vested accrued benefit or present value be less than a specified dollar amount is disregarded in determining employees to whom brf is available. Thus, current availability test would be ok.

This does not apply to the (facts and circumstances) effective availability test, but it seems unlikely that this would be an issue for a regular ongoing option.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use