Guest cphs Posted May 13, 2004 Posted May 13, 2004 Is it a common plan design to require lump sum distributions below a certain dollar amount (for example, $10,000) and installment distributions above that amount? I'm not aware of any problems with this arrangement, but would appreciate feedback.
stephen Posted May 14, 2004 Posted May 14, 2004 This is not a problem. We have many clients who have incorporated various break points in their distribution policy.
RTK Posted May 14, 2004 Posted May 14, 2004 Is the installment distribution a BRF (benefit right or feature) that should be reviewed for 401(a)(4) discrimination?
Guest cphs Posted May 24, 2004 Posted May 24, 2004 That's a good point. It appears that it is. Presumably you could solve that problem by permitting installments for all account balances, but then only permit lump sums below the designated threshold. Any other thoughts on this?
RTK Posted May 24, 2004 Posted May 24, 2004 Take a look at IRS Reg. 1.401(a)(4)-4(b)(2)(ii)(D) - a requirement that vested accrued benefit or present value be less than a specified dollar amount is disregarded in determining employees to whom brf is available. Thus, current availability test would be ok. This does not apply to the (facts and circumstances) effective availability test, but it seems unlikely that this would be an issue for a regular ongoing option.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now