ljr Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 Can anyone help me locate the thread I'm sure I saw on the topic of records retention for ERISA plans? I believe it cited something in ERISA on this topic. Cite from IRS? In reviewing old files, I'm finding our organization has records that date back well over 20 years and I'd like to document that it's okay to shred them now. Somehow keeping records for the current year plus 10 prior comes to mind? Thanks for any help you can offer. What does your organization do about retention of old allocations, documents, distribution forms, etc.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 No matter what the IRS says, I would never shred old papers. From personal experience I can say that there are times when you will need to refer back to them for certain clients. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Guest Ken Bonus Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 Another consideration is that the IRS and DOL will normally require correction of operational defects for all years that the defects existed, even if such years are past the normal statute of limitations. Better a packrat be!
Guest F1fan Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 See sections 107 and 209 of ERISA, and corresponding regulation 2520.107-1. For records pertaining to determination of a participant’s benefits, those would generally need to be retained as long as they are relevant. Therefore, depending on the record, there may not be a default time when the record may be destroyed.
david rigby Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 I agree with Blinky (OK, on this one, not always). There have been some prior discussion threads on this. For example, http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=23415 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=2400 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=1259 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=12007 http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=5234 I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 Hey, what's that crack about? "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now