LIBOR Posted June 15, 2004 Posted June 15, 2004 I'm considering a re-do of a 1/1/2003 DB valuation using 90% of the weighted average 30-year Treasury to create my Supermax. An Additional Funding Charge is avoided since my funded % is over 90% using the "gateway" rate. Also, the lookback rules of PFEA 2004 seem to indicate that I can recalculate using weighted corporate to see if quarterlies are necessary for 2004 - the funded % is over 100% and so quarterlies are not required. Two questions : (1) Is my read on the lookback rules correct for 2004 quarterlies ? and (2) will using the low end of the range for max purposes force me to use this same rate for some other purpose ? Thanks in advance for your time.
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted June 15, 2004 Posted June 15, 2004 (1) Yes (2) Yes, but I think your question focuses on your concern that by using the low-end rate in 2003, that will somehow affect you negatively in 2004? I don't see that it will since you too will be able to recompute the 2003 CL for DRC purposes in a like manner to 412(m). "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
LIBOR Posted June 15, 2004 Author Posted June 15, 2004 That's right ! By re-working 2003 for max purposes I don't want to create charges on the minimum side that weren't there before. As you note, we can re-calc 2003 for purposes of determining if quarterlies are necessary for 2004 ; and, the "gateway" calculation for DRC/AFC purposes is independent of the rate chosen for OBRA/RPA purposes. I was just checking to see I've covered all the bases. Thanks for your time and feedback !!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now