Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest beckys
Posted

It doesn't look to me like the delayed effective date applies to the QPSA changes? The announcement doesn't mention QPSA at all. And it says that 1.417(a)(3)-1 is delayed "with respect to QJSA". Does anyone have an opinion?

Posted

It is only some of the QJSA notices that are delayed.

The only reason for the delay is to allow companies to delete optional forms at retirement under the proposed 411(d)(6) regulations, prior to having to illustrate them under relative value regs. That can't be done until the proposed regs are finalized next year. That regulation has no effect on the QPSA notices, so there is no reason to delay them. Similarly, you cannot delete a lump sum option under the proposed regulations, so there was no need to delay their QJSA relative value disclosure, either.

Guest HarveyC
Posted

In terms of the QPSA notice, the relative value regs do not appear to apply to plans that fully subsidize the QPSA benefits; only plans that charge for QPSA coverage must comply with the relative value disclosure requirements. All the plans I deal with have fully subsidized QPSA benefits and so I'm ignoring the new disclosure requirements for the QPSA notices.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use