Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest dietpepsi
Posted

This seems to be an aggressive plan design but appears to be doable unless I am missing something. Please, let me know if I am missing something.

It is a 403(b) plan with an employer contribution (non-matching). The employer contribution only goes to certain HC employees. In order to pass coverage they are going to combine the the 403(b) employer contribution with a DB plan (that covers everyone) for the ratio percentage test and do a general test.

Site 1.410(b)-7(f).

Thanks

Guest mikewebb68
Posted

No, you are not missing something. In fact, this is a common plan design; although the twist here is that all employees benefit in the db (in most of the designs I see, the HCEs only benefit in the 403(b). This twist could possibly cause failure of the general test, espeically if there are some young HCEs in the group, since the test is sensitive to employee age.

The testing is complex, and the entity is likely to incur significant expense from the db plan actuary or other third party to test to plan.

I don't know if the upcoming 403(b) regulations would have a negative impact on the ability to design a 403(b) plan in such a matter, but I would suspect that the new regs would be silent on such an issue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use