Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest sparkl80
Posted

I'm aware that as part of EGTRRA a retired employee who has an existing 403(b) plan may receive contributions to the plan for up to five years after retirement. These post-retirement employer contributions are made using the ex-employee's unused sick leave or vacation pay. Would these contributions be considered true "employer contributions" for the purpose of qualifying the plan as subject to ERISA? My understanding is that a true non-ERISA plan is funded solely through salary deferrals; and it would seem to follow that unused vacation pay or sick leave would have been defined during the employee's tenure as a benefit, not as part of salary. Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thx.

Guest mikewebb68
Posted

Correct, such post-retirement contributions are employer contributions that would ERISAfy a 403(b) plan, unless it is a church or government (e.g. public school) plan. Church plans are not subject to ERISA unless they elect coverage, and public schools are never subject to ERISA.

  • 2 years later...
Guest Mpowers
Posted

Correct..contributions can be made as an employer contribution for up top five years after separation from employment...the same sick pay distributions can be used to pay for post retirement healthcare costs tax free.

Mark Powers

PRG

203-453-3151

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use